Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

39361

in Shuqualak, MississippiPopulation 1,190

35.52/ 100

Ranked #29,184 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 9.0%)

Ranked #295 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

8.2%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

21.3%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

4.8%

in the bottom 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.5%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.5%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

52.5%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

26%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.0%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

58.8 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

10.5%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Shuqualak, Mississippi (ZIP 39361) sits in the bottom 9.0% nationally (29,184th) and the bottom 27% of Mississippi (295th).

continue reading

A demanding profile, and several measures drive it: modeled self-care disability rests in the top 2.5% nationally, diabetes settles in the top 2.2% nationally, and stroke lands in the top 2.3% nationally. Modeled vision disability rests in the top 3.9% nationally, high blood pressure settles in the top 1.7% nationally, and mobility disability lands in the top 2.4% nationally. Fatal road crashes rests in the top 2.5% nationally. On the stronger side, modeled pfas settles in the bottom 1.0% nationally, and arsenic lands in the bottom 2.1% nationally. Modeled binge drinking rests in the bottom 2.1% nationally.

Put plainly, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 39328, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 57.7; chronic-disease standing 6.5 (bottom 10%) — 51 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,396 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.9%30.1–37.6
High blood pressure among adults52.5%48.0–56.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.8%6.1–7.5
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.7–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.2–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.0%9.7–12.5
Depression among adults17.8%14.8–20.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults21.3%18.7–24.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.0%35.3–44.4
Obesity among adults45.7%37.2–53.9
Stroke among adults6.5%5.9–7.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.6%21.0–30.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.5%12.1–17.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.7%80.2–84.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.3%80.1–86.0
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.1–87.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.7%57.9–69.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults6.8%5.7–8.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.3%65.7–81.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.5%8.5–12.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.1%18.0–24.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults41.5%35.8–47.1
Short sleep duration among adults42.0%34.7–49.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults32.7%28.8–36.7
Frequent mental distress among adults18.3%16.2–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults18.0%15.8–20.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.4%18.0–22.9
Any disability among adults45.1%39.9–50.0
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.5
Independent living disability among adults13.7%12.1–15.4
Mobility disability among adults26.0%23.0–29.2
Self-care disability among adults8.2%7.3–9.1
Vision disability among adults10.5%9.4–11.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults34.6%30.1–39.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults34.1%30.1–38.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.4%20.0–26.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.7%21.7–27.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults17.1%15.1–19.2
Loneliness among adults39.5%34.0–45.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults17.1%15.1–19.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–649.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)19.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)2.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle1.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription70.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate83.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population2.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households31.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+19.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age33.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$30,877$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$54,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$911$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.0 yr ± 1.4778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.47 years of 79.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured