Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

39335

in Lauderdale, MississippiPopulation 2,564

50.81/ 100

Ranked #15,132 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranked #35 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (top 8.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

0.81%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

78.8%

in the top 19% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US81st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

9.7 mi

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US79th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

69.4%

in the top 25% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US75th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

6.6%

in the bottom 28% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US28th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

The read

Lauderdale, Mississippi (ZIP 39335), in overall standing, comes out in the top 47% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,132nd) and the top 8.7% of Mississippi (35th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: modeled arsenic lies in the bottom 0.3% nationally, modeled radon registers in the bottom 13.7% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site is in the top 16% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure lies at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Housing-cost burden registers in the bottom 19% nationally. On the other hand, modeled humid heat is in the top 11.3% nationally, and high blood pressure lies in the top 13.0% nationally. Recreation registers at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Floodplain exposure is in the top 19% nationally. Physicians lies at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs.

Defined simply, for reference, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 39309, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 39%

16%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.3%28.2–34.5
High blood pressure among adults44.8%40.9–48.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.8–9.5
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.6–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.7–8.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%6.9–8.8
Depression among adults18.2%15.5–21.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.5%12.8–16.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.1%35.2–43.0
Obesity among adults38.6%32.8–44.8
Stroke among adults4.4%4.0–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.9%10.7–15.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.6%8.1–11.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.0%79.8–84.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.2%79.3–84.9
Cholesterol screening among adults88.6%87.0–90.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.4%65.2–73.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults12.0%10.3–13.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.8%72.8–84.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.6%11.2–16.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.1%13.0–17.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.5%26.5–34.8
Short sleep duration among adults37.9%32.9–43.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.2%18.6–23.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.9%14.1–17.7
Frequent physical distress among adults13.9%12.3–15.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.4%13.6–17.2
Any disability among adults35.6%31.6–39.6
Hearing disability among adults8.0%7.1–9.0
Independent living disability among adults8.9%8.0–9.9
Mobility disability among adults17.5%15.4–19.6
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.2–5.1
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.4–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.1%24.5–31.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.6%15.4–20.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.3–11.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.1%12.4–16.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.6%8.5–10.8
Loneliness among adults34.8%30.3–39.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.9–10.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–645.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)11.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)1.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle6.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription84.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate83.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households63.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+23.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age44.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$85,804$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$93,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$1,297$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.3 yr ± 0.5478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.54 years of 75.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured