Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38622

in Crowder, MississippiPopulation 594

35.35/ 100

Ranked #29,255 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 8.8%)

Ranked #297 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.9%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

52.8%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

20.8%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.3%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

48.3%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

25.3%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.8%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.0%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

35.4%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Crowder, Mississippi (ZIP 38622) places in the bottom 8.8% nationally (29,255th) and the bottom 27% of Mississippi (297th).

continue reading

The data opens on real and measurable burdens: modeled self-care disability is in the top 3.0% nationally, and high blood pressure lands in the top 1.5% nationally. Modeled diabetes stands in the top 2.7% nationally, and stroke registers in the top 2.8% nationally. Modeled obesity settles in the top 1.3% nationally, mobility disability sits in the top 3.1% nationally, and vision disability lies in the top 5.3% nationally. Poverty rests in the top 4.3% nationally. More encouragingly, fiber broadband resides at the national maximum, and modeled binge drinking is in the bottom 3.1% nationally.

Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 38606, just across the boundary. Modeled diabetes is in the top 2.7% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 26%

11%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.8%31.8–37.8
High blood pressure among adults52.8%49.4–56.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.4%6.7–8.1
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.8–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults9.7%8.7–10.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.6%9.9–13.3
Depression among adults18.9%16.4–21.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults20.8%18.6–22.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.1%37.6–44.6
Obesity among adults48.3%41.8–54.8
Stroke among adults6.3%5.7–7.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.9%16.0–21.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.3%10.9–15.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.0%81.0–84.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.5%81.1–85.8
Cholesterol screening among adults87.1%85.2–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.8%57.5–65.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults6.4%5.5–7.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.9%66.6–78.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.0%9.3–12.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.4%18.4–24.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults41.2%36.3–46.1
Short sleep duration among adults41.2%36.2–46.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults31.3%27.6–35.0
Frequent mental distress among adults18.1%16.2–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults17.8%15.7–19.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.6%17.3–22.1
Any disability among adults44.2%39.8–48.7
Hearing disability among adults9.2%8.2–10.3
Independent living disability among adults13.2%11.5–14.8
Mobility disability among adults25.3%22.4–28.2
Self-care disability among adults7.9%6.9–8.9
Vision disability among adults9.8%8.7–11.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults32.5%29.0–36.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults30.7%27.0–34.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults21.1%17.8–24.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.4%19.9–25.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults15.4%13.7–17.4
Loneliness among adults36.6%32.4–41.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults15.9%14.1–17.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate35.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–6413.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)24.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)6.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)5.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle10.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription66.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate73.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households22.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+18.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age30.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$30,400$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$49,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$491$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.0 yr ± 1.0278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.02 years of 74.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured