Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38849

in Guntown, MississippiPopulation 5,792

49.42/ 100

Ranked #17,038 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #50 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (top 12.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

1.0%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

53.7 mi

in the top 10.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Radon

1.1 pCi/L

in the bottom 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US27th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

33%

in the bottom 28% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US28th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

6.2%

in the bottom 26% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US26th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Guntown, Mississippi (ZIP 38849) lands in the bottom 47% nationally (17,038th) and the top 12.4% of Mississippi (50th).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site rests in the top 10.8% nationally. Fiber broadband is in the top 13.6% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure stands at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Housing-cost burden settles in the bottom 20% nationally. Against that, modeled loneliness lies in the top 10.1% nationally, and humid heat resides in the top 11.7% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Recreation registers at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Modeled colon screening sits in the bottom 16% nationally.

To translate a couple of terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 38866, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.2%24.4–30.3
High blood pressure among adults40.7%37.0–44.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.9–8.3
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.6–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.2%5.6–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.6%6.7–8.5
Depression among adults22.2%19.1–25.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.7–13.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.4%34.7–42.3
Obesity among adults35.5%30.1–41.5
Stroke among adults3.4%3.2–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.1%10.8–15.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.2%8.6–11.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.5%73.8–79.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.1%75.9–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.4%83.5–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.4%55.9–64.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults11.2%9.6–12.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.0%65.9–79.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.1%13.6–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.2%14.8–19.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.1%26.9–35.4
Short sleep duration among adults33.0%28.0–38.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.0%18.5–23.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.8%15.8–19.8
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.4–15.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.7%15.7–19.7
Any disability among adults35.0%31.0–39.1
Hearing disability among adults7.5%6.6–8.3
Independent living disability among adults9.0%8.0–10.0
Mobility disability among adults14.9%13.0–16.8
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.7–4.4
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.0%23.4–30.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.4%14.0–18.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.3%6.9–9.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.6–14.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.8–10.0
Loneliness among adults37.6%33.0–42.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.8–8.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–6412.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)12.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)1.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle2.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription87.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate85.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population0.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households44.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+14.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age36.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$76,019$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$152,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$908$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.0 yr ± 1.2578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.25 years of 78.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured