Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30453

in Reidsville, GeorgiaPopulation 8,506

33.68/ 100

Ranked #29,845 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 7.0%)

Ranked #665 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 6.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

23.5%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.0%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

44.7%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

21.8%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

32.1%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

17.9%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

26.1%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.6%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

18.5%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.1%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Reidsville, Georgia (ZIP 30453), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 7.0% nationally (29,845th) and the bottom 6.5% of Georgia (665th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: modeled arsenic lies in the bottom 2.6% nationally. By contrast, modeled uninsured sits in the top 2.8% nationally, short sleep settles in the top 3.5% nationally, and cognitive disability registers in the top 4.2% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health stands in the top 5.2% nationally, and transportation lands in the top 3.4% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity is in the top 3.4% nationally, and independent living disability resides in the top 5.0% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff rests in the top 3.4% nationally, and self-care disability lies in the top 5.4% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 30417, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 1%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.5 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $42,013 predicts 76.7 years — 2.2 years below.

    Ranked #2,975 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 92.5 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 31.3 — 61 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,644 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.5%22.5–28.7
High blood pressure among adults43.2%38.6–47.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.6%5.0–6.1
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.3–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.8–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.1%8.9–11.3
Depression among adults20.2%17.1–23.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.5%14.4–18.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.4%33.1–41.8
Obesity among adults44.1%35.5–53.1
Stroke among adults4.6%4.2–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years23.3%19.7–27.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years23.5%19.9–27.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.6%69.4–75.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.6%70.4–78.5
Cholesterol screening among adults78.0%75.1–80.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.8%51.6–61.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults42.0%38.4–45.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.3%64.1–79.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.4–18.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults25.0%21.8–28.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults38.6%33.2–44.4
Short sleep duration among adults44.7%37.4–52.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults32.1%28.4–36.2
Frequent mental distress among adults21.4%19.1–24.0
Frequent physical distress among adults18.2%16.0–20.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.8%19.3–24.5
Any disability among adults40.3%35.4–45.6
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.7–8.6
Independent living disability among adults13.6%12.0–15.3
Mobility disability among adults18.8%16.4–21.2
Self-care disability among adults7.1%6.3–8.0
Vision disability among adults9.6%8.6–10.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.3%26.1–34.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults34.7%30.1–39.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults32.9%28.6–37.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.1%22.7–29.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults17.9%15.6–20.2
Loneliness among adults40.2%34.4–46.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults18.5%16.1–20.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6430.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)20.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)8.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle9.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription78.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate64.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population5.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households32.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+10.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age36.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$42,013$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$117,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$709$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.5 yr ± 0.8878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.88 years of 74.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured