Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38641

in Lake Cormorant, MississippiPopulation 2,450

42.43/ 100

Ranked #24,888 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranked #169 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranked #38 of 81 Memphis, TN-MS-AR ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

53.1 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

9.6 µg/L

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

8.9%

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

94.9%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

13.0%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.9 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 15.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.41 per 1,000 residents

in the top 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$96,208

in the top 22% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US78th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Lake Cormorant, Mississippi (ZIP 38641) lands in the bottom 22% nationally (24,888th) and the top 42% of Mississippi (169th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: lithium in drinking water rests in the bottom 4.7% nationally, and housing-cost burden stands in the bottom 8.2% nationally. Homeownership lies in the top 8.8% nationally. Crowded housing lands at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. On the other side, fatal road crashes sits in the top 3.2% nationally, households without a vehicle is in the top 9.4% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden settles in the top 10.0% nationally. Floodplain exposure resides in the top 11.0% nationally, walkability registers in the bottom 15.0% nationally, and modeled humid heat rests in the top 15.0% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 38632, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Memphis, TN-MS-AR metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.6%28.2–35.0
High blood pressure among adults43.9%39.8–48.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.3%7.5–9.2
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.8–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.3–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.7–11.1
Depression among adults22.5%19.1–26.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.5%13.6–17.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.5%36.3–44.9
Obesity among adults38.7%32.2–45.5
Stroke among adults4.6%4.2–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.6%13.7–19.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.2%9.4–13.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.4%77.8–82.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.4%77.1–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%83.6–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.2%56.9–67.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults9.5%8.1–11.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.3%61.4–77.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.6%12.0–17.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.7%16.0–21.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.4%28.6–38.0
Short sleep duration among adults37.2%31.4–43.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.0%21.9–28.2
Frequent mental distress among adults18.0%15.8–20.2
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%14.0–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.4%16.2–20.6
Any disability among adults39.4%34.8–43.8
Hearing disability among adults9.2%8.2–10.3
Independent living disability among adults10.6%9.4–11.8
Mobility disability among adults19.5%17.1–22.0
Self-care disability among adults5.4%4.9–6.0
Vision disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.9%23.3–30.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.1%17.2–23.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.7%9.8–13.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.1%12.2–16.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.4%9.1–11.8
Loneliness among adults35.2%30.6–40.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.2–10.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–6417.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)13.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)0.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle13.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription89.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)8.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate94.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population3.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households45.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+13.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age38.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$96,208$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$237,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.5 yr ± 1.7278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.72 years of 77.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured