Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37645

in Mount Carmel, TennesseePopulation 5,472

47.09/ 100

Ranked #20,055 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranked #151 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranked #10 of 30 Kingsport-Bristol, TN-VA ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.89%

in the bottom 11.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

2.0%

in the bottom 14.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.5 pCi/L

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US80th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

0.71%

in the bottom 23% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US23rd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

Mount Carmel, Tennessee (ZIP 37645), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 37% nationally (20,055th) and the top 25% of Tennessee (151st).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: modeled extreme heat settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Floodplain exposure stands in the bottom 11.8% nationally, homeownership is in the top 14.7% nationally, and modeled energy burden rests in the bottom 14.0% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site sits in the top 17% nationally. Working the other way, modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the top 9.2% nationally, and lithium in drinking water lands in the top 16% nationally. Unemployment resides in the top 18% nationally. Physicians lies at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Modeled radon settles in the top 20% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 37656, about 6.4 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kingsport-Bristol, TN-VA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.3%30.9–37.9
High blood pressure among adults40.2%36.2–44.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.0–11.0
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.5–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.8–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.1%8.0–10.4
Depression among adults29.7%25.8–33.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.4%11.6–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.4%37.0–45.9
Obesity among adults38.1%31.1–45.5
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.9%12.2–18.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.4%7.5–11.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.3%75.3–81.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.9%74.1–81.3
Cholesterol screening among adults88.1%86.3–89.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.9%58.9–68.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.3%57.6–65.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.7%68.3–82.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.4%11.7–17.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.0%14.5–19.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.2%22.1–30.7
Short sleep duration among adults36.7%30.5–43.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.0%18.3–24.0
Frequent mental distress among adults18.5%16.4–20.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.3%13.5–17.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.7%14.7–18.9
Any disability among adults35.6%31.3–40.3
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.6
Independent living disability among adults9.0%7.9–10.2
Mobility disability among adults16.1%14.1–18.6
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6417.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)7.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)7.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle4.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription90.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate91.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households55.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+23.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age47.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$68,866$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$179,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$643$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.0 yr ± 0.9778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.97 years of 77.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured