Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37820

in New Market, TennesseePopulation 8,327

45.82/ 100

Ranked #21,528 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranked #178 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 29%)

Too few scored ZIPs in the Morristown, TN metro area to rank within it.

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

99.7%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST83rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.2%

in the bottom 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

5.2 ppb

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

US91st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, New Market, Tennessee (ZIP 37820) sits in the bottom 33% nationally (21,528th) and the top 29% of Tennessee (178th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: fiber broadband lies in the top 2.9% nationally, modeled arsenic settles in the bottom 5.6% nationally, and distance to an emergency room stands in the bottom 11.8% nationally. Housing-cost burden is in the bottom 20% nationally. On the other hand, PFAS in drinking water rests at the national maximum, and lead in tap water sits in the top 9.4% nationally. Modeled humid heat registers in the top 19% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden lands in the top 19% nationally. Physicians resides at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Childcare lies at the national minimum, shared with about 42% of ZIPs.

In plain language, PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. ZIP 37877, about 2.6 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Morristown, TN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.2%30.5–37.7
High blood pressure among adults40.6%36.2–44.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.9–10.7
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.6–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%7.0–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%8.4–10.7
Depression among adults30.0%25.9–34.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.3%11.4–15.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.3%34.8–43.7
Obesity among adults37.0%29.5–44.9
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.0%13.9–20.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.8%9.2–12.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.5%74.4–80.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.1%74.4–81.4
Cholesterol screening among adults87.3%85.5–88.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.5%61.4–71.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.0%54.1–61.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.7%66.8–81.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.1%11.5–17.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.2%15.8–20.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.6%22.1–31.0
Short sleep duration among adults36.8%30.2–44.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.6%19.7–25.4
Frequent mental distress among adults19.4%17.2–21.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%14.0–17.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.3%15.3–19.3
Any disability among adults36.4%31.7–40.8
Hearing disability among adults8.7%7.7–9.7
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.3–10.5
Mobility disability among adults17.0%14.7–19.2
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6411.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)8.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)3.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle1.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription89.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate82.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population0.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households55.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+17.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age45.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$66,616$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$204,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$906$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured