Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37353

in Mc Donald, TennesseePopulation 5,330

47.17/ 100

Ranked #19,957 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranked #146 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #2 of 14 Cleveland, TN ZIPs (top 14.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.19 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

91.8%

in the top 14.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Mc Donald, Tennessee (ZIP 37353) lands in the bottom 38% nationally (19,957th) and the top 24% of Tennessee (146th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: grocery sits in the top 7.8% nationally, and outpatient rests in the top 12.3% nationally. Homeownership is in the top 14.0% nationally, and modeled tree cover stands in the top 14.7% nationally. Housing-cost burden settles in the bottom 15% nationally. On the other hand, PFAS in drinking water lies at the national maximum, and unemployment resides in the top 11.0% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Recreation registers at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Physicians sits at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 37302, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cleveland, TN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 81%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.0 ± 1.0 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.0 years — 2.0 years above them.

    Ranked #1,400 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.4%29.6–35.2
High blood pressure among adults40.9%37.6–44.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.8–10.5
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.7–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.4%6.7–8.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.8%7.8–9.8
Depression among adults28.2%25.1–31.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.2%11.7–14.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.9%36.4–43.2
Obesity among adults39.1%33.8–44.5
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.6%12.4–17.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.1%8.6–11.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.8%75.3–80.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.2%75.2–80.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.9%86.3–89.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.9%58.8–67.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.7%56.7–62.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.3%67.2–79.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.9%12.7–17.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.4%14.3–18.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.8%20.4–27.1
Short sleep duration among adults37.6%33.1–42.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.8%18.5–23.1
Frequent mental distress among adults18.6%16.8–20.4
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.5–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.6%14.9–18.4
Any disability among adults35.3%31.8–38.9
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.4–9.1
Independent living disability among adults8.8%7.9–9.7
Mobility disability among adults15.9%14.0–17.8
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.5–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.5–5.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6416.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)9.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)30.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)9.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle1.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription93.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate91.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population8.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households58.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+19.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age48.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$74,252$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$253,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$1,093$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.0 yr ± 0.5378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.53 years of 78.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured