Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37129

in Murfreesboro, TennesseePopulation 63,652

54.45/ 100

Ranked #10,129 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #47 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 7.7%)

Ranked #25 of 110 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

5.4%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.41 per 1,000 residents

in the top 11.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

0.76 per 1,000 residents

in the top 12.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

5.1%

in the bottom 10.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.9%

in the bottom 10.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Park land

8.5%

in the top 13.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.7%

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

6.0%

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 37129, one of several in Murfreesboro, Tennessee, on the composite measure, lands in the top 32% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,129th) and the top 7.7% of Tennessee (47th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: distance to an emergency room stands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Outpatient is in the top 11.1% nationally. Distance to a community health center rests at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Dental providers sits in the top 12.1% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease registers in the bottom 10.9% nationally. Physicians lands in the top 12.7% nationally, and modeled energy burden resides in the bottom 10.9% nationally. On the other hand, modeled expected annual loss lies in the top 1.5% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure settles in the top 6.8% nationally. Modeled disaster risk stands in the top 7.4% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 37014, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.9 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $91,259 predicts 79.7 years — 1.8 years below.

    Ranked #2,250 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.4%24.4–30.4
High blood pressure among adults34.0%30.3–37.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.6%6.8–8.3
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.3–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults5.1%4.5–5.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.0%5.3–6.7
Depression among adults26.9%23.3–30.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.4%9.0–11.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.4%31.4–39.4
Obesity among adults36.5%30.3–42.8
Stroke among adults2.7%2.5–2.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.9%8.0–12.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.7%8.5–11.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.1%69.9–76.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.8%73.2–80.0
Cholesterol screening among adults87.4%85.7–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.2%58.3–68.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.2%59.6–66.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.2%71.2–84.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.5%13.7–19.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.8%12.0–15.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.9%17.7–24.5
Short sleep duration among adults35.9%30.2–41.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.6%14.6–18.8
Frequent mental distress among adults18.6%16.6–20.8
Frequent physical distress among adults12.5%11.0–14.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.3%13.6–17.0
Any disability among adults29.9%26.2–33.8
Hearing disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.7
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.6–8.2
Mobility disability among adults11.9%10.4–13.5
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.7–3.2
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–647.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)5.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)41.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)3.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle2.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription95.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate65.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population7.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households49.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+12.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age37.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$91,259$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$422,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$1,717$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.9 yr ± 0.5678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.56 years of 77.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured