Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37377

in Signal Mountain, TennesseePopulation 17,188

61.02/ 100

Ranked #4,115 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 12.9%)

Ranked #19 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 3.1%)

Ranked #4 of 45 Chattanooga, TN-GA ZIPs (top 8.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

99.9%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

81.1%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

1.7 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$119,636

in the top 9.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.92%

in the bottom 11.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.8%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

2.7%

in the bottom 10.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

71.7%

in the top 11.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

6.3%

in the bottom 12.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

29.7%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

The read

Signal Mountain, Tennessee (ZIP 37377), by its overall standing, sits in the top 12.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,115th) and the top 3.1% of Tennessee (19th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: fiber broadband lies in the top 2.2% nationally, modeled tree cover sits in the top 4.5% nationally, and fatal road crashes settles in the bottom 6.1% nationally. Household income registers in the top 9.8% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise stands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Floodplain exposure lands in the bottom 11.9% nationally, and modeled energy burden is in the bottom 9.9% nationally. Distance to a nursing home resides at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled self-care disability rests in the bottom 10.1% nationally. Set against that, modeled expected annual loss lies in the top 11.1% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 37350, about 6.4 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chattanooga, TN-GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 81.4 ± 1.3 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 75.4 years — 6.0 years above them.

    Ranked #44 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.1%28.3–33.8
High blood pressure among adults37.0%34.0–40.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%10.1–12.0
Current asthma among adults10.1%9.0–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%6.0–7.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.5%5.8–7.3
Depression among adults25.6%22.9–28.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.8%9.6–12.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.2%36.0–42.4
Obesity among adults29.7%26.0–33.7
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.6%8.0–11.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.6%5.6–7.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.3%75.8–80.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.1%77.5–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults91.3%90.2–92.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.7%67.9–75.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.1%68.4–73.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.2%73.5–83.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%12.9–17.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.2%9.7–12.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.1%14.9–19.6
Short sleep duration among adults32.5%28.5–36.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.2%13.6–17.1
Frequent mental distress among adults14.6%13.1–16.2
Frequent physical distress among adults11.8%10.6–13.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.1%10.8–13.5
Any disability among adults27.4%24.6–30.4
Hearing disability among adults7.5%6.8–8.3
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Mobility disability among adults12.1%10.7–13.6
Self-care disability among adults2.7%2.5–3.0
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.2–3.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–648.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)4.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)59.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)2.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle1.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription91.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate85.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population2.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households52.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+23.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age45.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$119,636$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$529,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$1,614$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.4 yr ± 0.6578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.65 years of 81.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured