Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

36075

in Shorter, AlabamaPopulation 1,580

39.29/ 100

Ranked #27,211 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 15%)

Ranked #422 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #12 of 15 Auburn-Opelika, AL ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Diabetes

22.1%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

54.9%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

0.88%

in the bottom 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

10.2%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.2%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

57 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

47%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.1%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

24%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.8%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

By its overall health score, Shorter, Alabama (ZIP 36075) lands in the bottom 15% nationally (27,211th) and the bottom 32% of Alabama (422nd).

continue reading

Where this area bears down hardest, the measures speak first: modeled diabetes rests in the top 1.7% nationally, and high blood pressure is in the top 0.9% nationally. Modeled stroke stands in the top 3.2% nationally, and fatal road crashes settles in the top 2.7% nationally. Modeled obesity lies in the top 2.1% nationally, self-care disability resides in the top 5.4% nationally, and mobility disability lands in the top 4.9% nationally. Slow internet speeds registers in the top 6.3% nationally. On the encouraging side, modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 0.8% nationally, and binge drinking rests in the bottom 1.6% nationally.

To translate a couple of terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 36013, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Auburn-Opelika, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 86%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 73.8; chronic-disease standing 5.3 (bottom 10%) — 69 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,158 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.9%31.7–39.8
High blood pressure among adults54.9%50.1–59.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.7–8.3
Current asthma among adults11.3%9.8–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.1–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.7%8.4–11.2
Depression among adults20.0%16.6–23.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults22.1%19.2–25.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.6%38.5–48.3
Obesity among adults47.0%37.9–56.0
Stroke among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.4%17.8–25.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.1%9.0–13.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.4%80.8–85.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.4%81.1–87.1
Cholesterol screening among adults88.2%86.4–89.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.2%63.1–73.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.9%47.9–56.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.8%70.5–84.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.2%8.1–12.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.2%14.3–20.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.7%30.1–41.3
Short sleep duration among adults41.9%34.8–49.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults30.1%26.0–34.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%14.9–19.2
Frequent physical distress among adults16.5%14.3–18.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.0%14.7–19.3
Any disability among adults42.2%36.9–47.3
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.2–9.2
Independent living disability among adults12.1%10.5–13.7
Mobility disability among adults24.0%20.7–27.3
Self-care disability among adults7.1%6.2–8.0
Vision disability among adults8.6%7.6–9.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.7%26.4–35.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults28.3%23.9–33.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults22.1%18.5–26.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.1%17.1–23.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.5–15.5
Loneliness among adults37.9%32.3–44.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.1%12.2–16.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6419.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)18.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle5.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription74.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)12.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate89.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population5.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households57.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+36.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age58.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$53,505$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$115,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.4 yr ± 1.1978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.19 years of 75.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured