Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

35746

in Fackler, AlabamaPopulation 1,023

37.32/ 100

Ranked #28,373 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 11.6%)

Ranked #482 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

99.7%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20.5%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

98.4%

in the top 6.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.9 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.5%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

42.1%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

65.1%

in the top 11.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

59.8%

in the bottom 13.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US14th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Park land

5.9%

in the top 17% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

71%

in the bottom 19% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US19th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Fackler, Alabama (ZIP 35746) places in the bottom 11.6% nationally (28,373rd) and the bottom 22% of Alabama (482nd).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: fiber broadband is in the top 2.7% nationally, and home broadband subscription lands in the top 6.7% nationally. Modeled tree cover stands in the top 11.9% nationally. Crowded housing registers at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, modeled cognitive disability settles in the top 7.5% nationally, walkability sits in the bottom 7.0% nationally, and modeled independent living disability lies in the top 8.8% nationally. Modeled short sleep rests in the top 8.9% nationally, fatal road crashes resides in the top 14.0% nationally, and modeled fair or poor health is in the top 14.3% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 35776, about 2.1 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 2%

8%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.5%29.8–37.2
High blood pressure among adults43.2%38.7–47.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.7–9.5
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.6–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.2–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.8%9.1–12.8
Depression among adults28.6%24.5–33.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.0%12.9–17.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.4%36.9–46.0
Obesity among adults39.4%31.4–47.7
Stroke among adults4.5%3.9–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.4%18.0–25.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.8%9.2–14.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.9%74.0–79.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.2%74.5–81.6
Cholesterol screening among adults82.3%79.5–84.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.8%54.5–64.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.4%45.4–53.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.0%62.4–78.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.7%12.0–17.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.0%16.5–23.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.5%27.0–38.4
Short sleep duration among adults42.1%35.2–49.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.5%23.4–32.0
Frequent mental distress among adults20.3%17.8–23.0
Frequent physical distress among adults17.3%15.0–19.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.5%17.4–23.7
Any disability among adults44.1%38.4–49.7
Hearing disability among adults9.9%8.7–11.2
Independent living disability among adults12.5%10.6–14.4
Mobility disability among adults20.3%17.3–23.6
Self-care disability among adults5.6%4.7–6.5
Vision disability among adults7.1%6.1–8.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.6%21.6–30.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.5%17.6–25.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.3%13.2–19.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.1%11.7–16.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.3–12.8
Loneliness among adults35.4%30.0–41.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.3–11.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6415.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)24.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)1.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle2.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription98.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate87.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population7.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households78.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+33.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age55.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$50,357$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$166,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.9 yr ± 0.9278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.92 years of 73.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured