ZIP code
35462
in Eutaw, AlabamaPopulation 4,203
29.33/ 100
Ranked #30,900 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 3.7%)
Ranked #590 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 4.7%)
Ranked #27 of 31 Tuscaloosa, AL ZIPs (bottom 13.0%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Self-care disability
10.6%
in the top 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
26.7%
in the top 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Stroke
8.2%
in the top 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Vision disability
13.3%
in the top 1.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
30.9%
in the top 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
17.1%
in the top 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
59%
in the top 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Short sleep
49.5%
in the top 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
38.6%
in the top 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›Obesity
53.2%
in the top 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.
Full methodology ›The read
By the composite measure, Eutaw, Alabama (ZIP 35462) sits in the bottom 3.7% nationally (30,900th) and the bottom 4.7% of Alabama (590th).
What the numbers press hardest on defines much of the story here: modeled self-care disability rests in the top 0.4% nationally, diabetes sits in the top 0.3% nationally, and stroke registers in the top 0.3% nationally. Modeled vision disability lands in the top 1.1% nationally, mobility disability resides in the top 0.4% nationally, and independent living disability lies in the top 1.0% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure settles in the top 0.3% nationally, and short sleep stands in the top 0.4% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health is in the top 1.0% nationally, and obesity rests in the top 0.2% nationally.
ZIP 35441, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall. Modeled vision disability rests in the top 1.1% nationally.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Tuscaloosa, AL metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 90%
14%
Healthcare Access
in the top 0.00%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 46%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 44%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
in the bottom 0.9%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 4%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 2%
11%
Disability
in the bottom 0.9%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 19%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 84%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 66%
8%
Healthcare Access
in the top 0.00%
5%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 48%
13%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 2%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 13%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 3%
11%
Disability
healthier than 2%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 21%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 67%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 67%
8%
Healthcare Access
in the top 0.00%
5%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 47%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 3%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 20%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 37%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 3%
11%
Disability
in the bottom 0.00%
7%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Clean environment, heavy chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 89.5; chronic-disease standing 0.8 (bottom 1%) — 89 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #158 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
35441
Alabamashares a border
Score 44.90
Closest healthier
35442
Alabamashares a border
Score 32.49
Similar health profile
30477
Georgia99% similar profile
Score 31.84
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 38.4% | 34.5–42.2 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 59.0% | 54.5–63.3 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 6.9% | 6.2–7.6 |
| Current asthma among adults | 12.2% | 10.8–13.8 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 11.3% | 10.3–12.5 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 13.7% | 12.1–15.2 |
| Depression among adults | 20.7% | 17.4–24.2 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 26.7% | 23.7–29.7 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 44.5% | 39.8–49.1 |
| Obesity among adults | 53.2% | 43.8–61.8 |
| Stroke among adults | 8.2% | 7.5–8.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 28.6% | 24.3–33.3 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 14.6% | 12.2–17.5 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 83.1% | 81.0–85.3 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 84.7% | 81.9–87.5 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 85.5% | 83.6–87.5 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 65.0% | 59.7–70.1 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 42.5% | 38.6–46.5 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 78.4% | 71.1–84.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 9.0% | 7.2–11.1 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 22.9% | 19.8–26.0 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 44.2% | 38.1–49.7 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 49.5% | 42.0–56.9 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 38.6% | 34.6–42.4 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 19.2% | 16.9–21.5 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 19.9% | 17.6–22.2 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 21.1% | 18.6–23.5 |
| Any disability among adults | 49.5% | 44.1–54.4 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 9.6% | 8.6–10.8 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 17.1% | 15.2–19.0 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 30.9% | 27.8–34.0 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 10.6% | 9.6–11.7 |
| Vision disability among adults | 13.3% | 12.1–14.6 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 32.0% | 27.4–36.6 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 42.0% | 37.3–46.7 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 40.2% | 35.6–44.7 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 28.1% | 24.4–31.7 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 20.4% | 17.8–23.0 |
| Loneliness among adults | 38.3% | 32.7–44.3 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 22.7% | 19.9–25.5 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 34.3% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 15.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 17.3% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 13.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 13.1% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 13.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 18.4% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 16.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 1.5% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622 |
| Households without a vehicle | 13.8% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622 |
| Broadband subscription | 73.5% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 84.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 29.5% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622 |
| Homeownership rate | 50.5% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 78.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 3.2% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622 |
| Foreign-born population | 1.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628 |
| Single-parent households | 42.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 50.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617 |
| Population 65+ | 23.8% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628 |
| Median age | 42.5 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621 |
| Median household income | $31,528 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587 |
| Median home value | $94,900 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568 |
| Median gross rent | $431 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $856 ($625–$1,266) n=503 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled. | |||
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured