ZIP code
36744
in Greensboro, AlabamaPopulation 5,491
28.07/ 100
Ranked #31,091 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 3.1%)
Ranked #595 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 3.9%)
Ranked #29 of 31 Tuscaloosa, AL ZIPs (bottom 6.5%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Self-care disability
9.5%
in the top 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
23.4%
in the top 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST92ndUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
16.4%
in the top 1.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›Vision disability
12.0%
in the top 2.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
33.7%
in the top 1.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›Stroke
7.1%
in the top 1.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
28%
in the top 1.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
55.3%
in the top 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST91stUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
36.7%
in the top 1.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›Short sleep
47.8%
in the top 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›The read
Judged by its overall standing, Greensboro, Alabama (ZIP 36744) sits in the bottom 3.1% nationally (31,091st) and the bottom 3.9% of Alabama (595th).
The profile carries real weight, and several readings make that plain: modeled self-care disability lands in the top 1.0% nationally, diabetes rests in the top 1.0% nationally, and independent living disability settles in the top 1.3% nationally. Modeled vision disability lands in the top 2.1% nationally, tooth loss rests in the top 1.6% nationally, and stroke settles in the top 1.1% nationally. Modeled mobility disability lands in the top 1.2% nationally, and high blood pressure rests in the top 0.8% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health settles in the top 1.7% nationally, and short sleep lands in the top 1.0% nationally.
A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 35441, just across the boundary. Modeled vision disability lands in the top 2.1% nationally.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Tuscaloosa, AL metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 93%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 68%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 1%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 2%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 28%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 3%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 34%
8%
Disability
healthier than 1%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 18%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 92%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 73%
5%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 49%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 4%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 8%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 17%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 5%
11%
Disability
healthier than 3%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 18%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 87%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 83%
5%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 47%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 43%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 10%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 7%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 13%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 10%
11%
Disability
healthier than 7%
7%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Below what income predicts
The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes
Estimated life expectancy is 74.0 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $30,518 predicts 75.4 years — 1.4 years below.
Ranked #1,762 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.
Clean environment, heavy chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 93.1 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 1.2 (bottom 10%) — 92 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #72 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
35441
Alabamashares a border
Score 44.90
Closest healthier
35474
Alabamashares a border
Score 48.73
Similar health profile
30816
Georgia100% similar profile
Score 37.65
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 36.8% | 33.0–40.6 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 55.3% | 50.8–59.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 7.1% | 6.4–7.9 |
| Current asthma among adults | 12.1% | 10.6–13.7 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.4% | 9.4–11.4 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 13.0% | 11.6–14.5 |
| Depression among adults | 21.5% | 18.1–25.2 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 23.4% | 20.7–26.2 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 43.3% | 38.7–48.1 |
| Obesity among adults | 51.3% | 42.6–60.0 |
| Stroke among adults | 7.1% | 6.5–7.7 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 33.7% | 28.7–38.8 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 14.5% | 12.4–17.0 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 81.6% | 79.1–83.8 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 83.2% | 80.0–86.0 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 84.5% | 82.4–86.4 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 62.5% | 56.9–67.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 40.3% | 36.5–44.2 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 75.2% | 67.1–82.1 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 10.0% | 7.9–12.2 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 22.9% | 20.0–26.0 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 41.6% | 36.2–47.2 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 47.8% | 40.6–55.2 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 36.7% | 33.1–40.7 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 19.8% | 17.6–22.3 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 19.4% | 17.2–21.7 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 21.6% | 19.3–24.1 |
| Any disability among adults | 47.6% | 42.8–52.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 9.5% | 8.5–10.6 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 16.4% | 14.8–18.3 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 28.0% | 25.1–31.1 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 9.5% | 8.6–10.4 |
| Vision disability among adults | 12.0% | 11.0–13.2 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 30.6% | 26.6–35.0 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 39.2% | 35.4–43.2 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 36.5% | 33.1–40.2 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 26.7% | 23.7–29.9 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 19.2% | 17.3–21.4 |
| Loneliness among adults | 38.0% | 32.6–43.7 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 20.8% | 18.5–23.2 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 35.7% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 15.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 4.5% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 13.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 21.7% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 13.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 17.3% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 16.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 6.9% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622 |
| Households without a vehicle | 12.8% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622 |
| Broadband subscription | 79.6% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 84.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 32.9% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622 |
| Homeownership rate | 65.6% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 78.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 1.8% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622 |
| Foreign-born population | 1.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628 |
| Single-parent households | 58.5% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 50.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617 |
| Population 65+ | 25.4% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628 |
| Median age | 44.4 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621 |
| Median household income | $30,518 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587 |
| Median home value | $136,100 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568 |
| Median gross rent | $669 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $856 ($625–$1,266) n=503 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 74.0 yr ± 0.72 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 74.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.72 years of 74.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured