Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

34743

in Kissimmee, FloridaPopulation 40,030

50.37/ 100

Ranked #15,737 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranked #567 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #70 of 92 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

28.1%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

552 units

in the top 3.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

46.3%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

2.2%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

8.9%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.9%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.6 pCi/L

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

42.2%

in the top 12.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

5 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US20th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, ZIP 34743, one of several in Kissimmee, Florida sits in the top 49% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,737th) and the bottom 42% of Florida (567th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 3.9% nationally, modeled radon rests in the bottom 1.6% nationally, and walkability settles in the top 11.3% nationally. Distance to a community health center lands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. On the other hand, modeled uninsured rests in the top 1.5% nationally, and disaster risk settles in the top 4.1% nationally. Housing-cost burden lands in the top 4.7% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise rests in the top 6.2% nationally. Modeled vision disability settles in the top 7.9% nationally, and crowded housing lands in the top 8.7% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, outer-floodplain exposure runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 32824, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 99%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 9%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.1 ± 2.4 years. A median household income of $62,992 predicts 78.3 years — 4.8 years above.

    Ranked #72 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 83.1 ± 2.4 years. The 45 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.5 years — 3.6 years above them.

    Ranked #492 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.3%19.7–25.0
High blood pressure among adults37.0%33.3–40.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.8%5.2–6.4
Current asthma among adults8.8%7.8–10.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.1–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.8%5.2–6.4
Depression among adults16.2%13.7–18.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.4%14.5–18.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.3%35.5–43.3
Obesity among adults42.2%35.9–48.6
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.4%12.7–18.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years28.1%24.6–31.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.2%73.4–78.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.8%72.2–79.2
Cholesterol screening among adults84.5%82.7–86.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.7%54.8–64.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.7%46.2–53.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.8%67.2–81.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.8%11.3–16.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.2%10.4–14.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.9%29.4–38.5
Short sleep duration among adults40.4%34.9–45.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.8%23.8–29.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.7%14.8–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults16.1%14.3–18.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.0%14.2–17.9
Any disability among adults34.1%30.2–38.2
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.4–8.0
Independent living disability among adults8.9%8.0–9.9
Mobility disability among adults16.8%14.9–18.9
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.7
Vision disability among adults8.9%8.1–9.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6414.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)14.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)6.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle4.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription94.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)46.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate69.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population29.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households43.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+14.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age38.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$62,992$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$321,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,827$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.1 yr ± 1.2478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.24 years of 83.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured