Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32832

in Orlando, FloridaPopulation 40,196

64.52/ 100

Ranked #2,203 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 6.9%)

Ranked #61 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 6.3%)

Ranked #5 of 92 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL ZIPs (top 5.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

197.1 days/year

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

3.9%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

3.6%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

24.9%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

1.9%

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

7.8%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

45.1%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.2%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.5%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

ZIP 32832, one of several in Orlando, Florida ranks in the top 6.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,203rd) and the top 6.3% of Florida (61st).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: modeled hearing disability settles in the bottom 1.9% nationally, and coronary heart disease rests in the bottom 2.3% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure lands in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and stroke settles in the bottom 2.0% nationally. Modeled mobility disability rests in the bottom 2.9% nationally, arsenic lands in the bottom 4.5% nationally, and independent living disability settles in the bottom 3.6% nationally. Modeled energy burden rests in the bottom 4.4% nationally. Working the other way, modeled humid heat lands in the top 0.6% nationally, and floodplain exposure settles in the top 5.0% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 32803, about 7.4 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 71%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.9%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 99%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults15.9%13.9–18.0
High blood pressure among adults24.9%22.0–27.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.3%4.7–5.8
Current asthma among adults8.4%7.4–9.4
Coronary heart disease among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
Depression among adults16.0%13.6–18.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.4%7.3–9.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.5%29.0–36.0
Obesity among adults30.1%25.5–35.0
Stroke among adults1.9%1.7–2.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.8%4.7–7.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.2%11.4–15.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure69.4%65.8–72.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.8%71.3–78.1
Cholesterol screening among adults87.5%85.9–89.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.9%56.5–65.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.9%62.9–68.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.1%73.0–84.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%14.4–20.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.5%7.2–9.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.4%15.5–21.5
Short sleep duration among adults38.6%34.2–43.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.7%11.9–15.6
Frequent mental distress among adults14.5%12.8–16.3
Frequent physical distress among adults10.2%8.9–11.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.2%9.9–12.6
Any disability among adults21.2%18.3–24.2
Hearing disability among adults3.9%3.5–4.4
Independent living disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.9
Mobility disability among adults7.8%6.8–9.0
Self-care disability among adults2.4%2.1–2.6
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–649.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)3.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)56.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)3.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle2.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription97.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)37.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate68.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population26.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households34.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+6.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age35.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$118,856$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$497,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$2,314$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.5 yr ± 1.5478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.54 years of 81.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured