Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33566

in Plant City, FloridaPopulation 24,521

50.39/ 100

Ranked #15,710 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranked #566 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #83 of 133 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

192.2 days/year

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

19.1%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.2%

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST28th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

68%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

387 units

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST85th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, ZIP 33566, one of several in Plant City, Florida sits in the top 49% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,710th) and the bottom 42% of Florida (566th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: modeled arsenic is in the bottom 4.9% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing rests in the top 6.2% nationally. Working the other way, modeled humid heat sits in the top 0.8% nationally, uninsured registers in the top 5.3% nationally, and pfas lands in the top 5.0% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss resides in the top 12.7% nationally, and floodplain exposure lies in the top 14.1% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site settles in the bottom 15.0% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility stands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Crowded housing is in the top 18% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. ZIP 33811, less than a tenth of a mile away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.9%21.4–26.3
High blood pressure among adults34.7%31.5–37.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.9%7.2–8.6
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.6–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.1–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.4%6.7–8.2
Depression among adults18.0%15.5–20.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.6%11.1–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.4%36.9–43.9
Obesity among adults31.9%27.2–36.7
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.4%12.8–18.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.1%17.0–21.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.7%71.9–77.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.2%71.9–78.3
Cholesterol screening among adults83.6%81.8–85.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.3%58.7–67.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.8%50.5–56.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.5%71.0–82.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.8%14.3–19.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.5%12.7–16.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.3%23.0–29.8
Short sleep duration among adults38.2%33.6–42.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.7%19.4–24.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.8%16.0–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%13.2–16.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.6%14.0–17.3
Any disability among adults32.8%29.5–36.4
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.4–7.9
Independent living disability among adults8.9%8.1–9.9
Mobility disability among adults14.7%13.1–16.4
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.6
Vision disability among adults6.5%5.9–7.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6423.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)13.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)5.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle1.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription95.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate72.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population17.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households46.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+14.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age37.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$72,393$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$330,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,398$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.2 yr ± 0.8278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.82 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured