Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33463

in Greenacres, FloridaPopulation 65,478

52.77/ 100

Ranked #12,419 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranked #479 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranked #128 of 183 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

96.3%

in the top 0.03% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

21.8%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

183.4 days/year

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST50th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.0%

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

584 units

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

94.8%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

43.6%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

94.8%

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

34.2%

in the bottom 14.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 33463, one of several in Greenacres, Florida places in the top 39% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,419th) and the top 49% of Florida (479th).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: modeled arsenic settles in the bottom 2.6% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing sits in the top 3.7% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the bottom 8.7% nationally, and walkability rests in the top 11.1% nationally. On the other side, modeled pfas resides in the top 0.03% nationally, uninsured is in the top 3.5% nationally, and humid heat lands in the top 1.5% nationally. PFOA in drinking water stands in the top 6.5% nationally, housing-cost burden registers in the top 6.5% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water settles in the top 6.7% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 33436, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.6%21.2–26.1
High blood pressure among adults32.8%29.7–36.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.4%5.8–7.0
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.7–10.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.7–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%6.1–7.4
Depression among adults16.0%13.7–18.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.9%12.3–15.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.2%30.9–37.7
Obesity among adults30.3%25.4–35.5
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.6%13.6–19.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years21.8%19.5–24.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.9%73.0–78.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.3%73.1–79.5
Cholesterol screening among adults83.5%81.7–85.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.7%55.7–65.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.7%49.0–56.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.2%68.8–82.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.7%11.4–16.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.3%12.5–16.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.3%26.6–34.2
Short sleep duration among adults40.1%34.8–45.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.8%21.4–26.4
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%15.5–19.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%13.1–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.2%14.6–17.9
Any disability among adults32.7%29.2–36.3
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.9–7.2
Independent living disability among adults9.3%8.4–10.2
Mobility disability among adults15.3%13.7–17.1
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.4–5.2
Vision disability among adults7.5%6.9–8.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6426.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)18.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)6.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle3.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription94.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)43.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate72.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population41.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households41.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+14.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age38.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$73,865$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$363,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,791$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.1 yr ± 0.5978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.59 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured