Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

34714

in Clermont, FloridaPopulation 28,200

54.85/ 100

Ranked #9,620 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #390 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranked #47 of 92 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

201.8 days/year

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

65.3%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

668 units

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST47th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

50.7%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST13th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

15.7%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST64th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.7%

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

30%

in the bottom 11.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

5.3%

in the bottom 13.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

In its overall standing, ZIP 34714, one of several in Clermont, Florida lands in the top 30% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,620th) and the top 40% of Florida (390th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: subsidized affordable housing registers in the top 3.0% nationally, and modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 9.1% nationally. Distance to a community health center settles at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled radon is in the bottom 4.7% nationally, and hearing disability sits in the bottom 12.1% nationally. On the other side, modeled humid heat lands in the top 0.4% nationally, and floodplain exposure lies in the top 2.1% nationally. Homeownership stands in the bottom 9.5% nationally, and housing-cost burden rests in the top 12.4% nationally. Modeled uninsured registers in the top 9.8% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. On the overall standing, ZIP 34711, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.3%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.3%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.7%19.5–24.1
High blood pressure among adults30.0%27.0–33.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.0%6.4–7.6
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.5–10.6
Coronary heart disease among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
Depression among adults18.2%15.7–21.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.0%9.8–12.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.1%30.8–37.6
Obesity among adults35.5%30.0–41.2
Stroke among adults2.7%2.6–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.8%8.2–11.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.7%13.7–17.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.2%70.6–75.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.7%72.2–79.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.3%83.4–87.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.8%59.5–67.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.9%53.6–60.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.1%68.7–80.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.4%14.5–20.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.2%9.7–12.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.2%20.1–26.5
Short sleep duration among adults38.0%33.3–42.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.8%15.8–19.9
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%15.5–19.2
Frequent physical distress among adults12.8%11.5–14.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.0%12.5–15.5
Any disability among adults28.3%25.1–31.7
Hearing disability among adults5.6%5.1–6.2
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.4–7.9
Mobility disability among adults11.7%10.4–13.1
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.9–3.4
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.5–5.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6413.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)5.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)4.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle2.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription95.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate50.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population14.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households52.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+12.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age35.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$75,392$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$387,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,750$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.7 yr ± 0.5478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.54 years of 78.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured