Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

34711

in Clermont, FloridaPopulation 70,317

57.12/ 100

Ranked #7,170 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #281 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #34 of 92 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

203.9 days/year

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

42.6%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

1.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST78th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US91st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US90th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

5.3%

in the bottom 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US20th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 34711, one of several in Clermont, Florida comes out in the top 22% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,170th) and the top 29% of Florida (281st).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: distance to an emergency room registers at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Physicians stands in the top 7.7% nationally. Distance to a community health center lands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Dental providers is in the top 11.5% nationally. By contrast, modeled humid heat resides in the top 0.4% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site rests at the national minimum. Floodplain exposure lies in the top 5.6% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss sits in the top 8.9% nationally. Modeled disaster risk settles in the top 9.6% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden registers in the top 11.2% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 34787, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.1%24.4–30.1
High blood pressure among adults35.3%31.9–38.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%9.0–10.8
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.4–10.7
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.2–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Depression among adults16.9%14.4–19.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%11.2–14.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.7%34.9–42.5
Obesity among adults33.6%28.2–39.5
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.2%7.6–11.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.2%10.7–13.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%76.2–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.4%76.2–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults88.8%87.4–90.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.8%63.5–71.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.3%58.0–64.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.8%69.4–81.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.6–18.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.5%9.1–12.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.6%19.4–26.0
Short sleep duration among adults36.2%31.5–41.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.4%15.4–19.5
Frequent mental distress among adults15.2%13.6–17.0
Frequent physical distress among adults13.3%11.8–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.2%10.9–13.6
Any disability among adults29.1%25.8–32.5
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.3–7.8
Independent living disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.7
Mobility disability among adults13.7%12.1–15.4
Self-care disability among adults3.3%3.0–3.6
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.3–5.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–649.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)4.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)37.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)4.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle3.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription93.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)33.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate74.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population15.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households53.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+22.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age43.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$90,245$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$409,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,883$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.2 yr ± 0.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.55 years of 80.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured