Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33542

in Zephyrhills, FloridaPopulation 23,612

43.94/ 100

Ranked #23,475 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #776 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranked #124 of 133 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL ZIPs (bottom 6.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

91.2%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

184.4 days/year

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST53rd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.5%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

3.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.9%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

45.8%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.6%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.44 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

120 intersections/sq mi

in the top 8.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, ZIP 33542, one of several in Zephyrhills, Florida lands in the bottom 27% nationally (23,475th) and the bottom 20% of Florida (776th).

continue reading

Where this area bears down hardest, the measures speak first: modeled pfas is in the top 0.4% nationally, and humid heat stands in the top 1.4% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease settles in the top 2.8% nationally, and hearing disability lies in the top 4.8% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol resides in the top 3.0% nationally, and stroke lands in the top 6.9% nationally. On the encouraging side, physicians registers in the top 2.9% nationally, modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 3.8% nationally, and pharmacy rests in the top 6.7% nationally. Walkability is in the top 8.3% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 33540, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 67.6; chronic-disease standing 8.4 (bottom 10%) — 59 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,797 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.6%33.4–39.8
High blood pressure among adults46.5%42.8–50.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.1%11.9–14.1
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.1–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults11.5%10.5–12.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.9%10.8–13.2
Depression among adults19.6%16.9–22.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.7%14.8–18.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.8%41.9–49.6
Obesity among adults33.2%27.9–38.4
Stroke among adults5.6%5.2–6.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.9%15.0–21.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.0%14.2–17.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.8%80.4–84.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.3%77.4–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.9%86.5–89.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.2%62.8–71.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.3%48.9–55.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.5%65.5–78.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.7%10.6–14.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.0%14.1–18.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.2%28.3–36.3
Short sleep duration among adults36.7%31.8–41.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.7%22.1–27.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.7%15.0–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults18.2%16.3–20.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.9%14.3–17.7
Any disability among adults41.7%37.8–45.6
Hearing disability among adults11.9%10.8–13.1
Independent living disability among adults10.5%9.5–11.7
Mobility disability among adults22.0%19.7–24.4
Self-care disability among adults5.4%5.0–5.9
Vision disability among adults7.4%6.8–8.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6416.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)10.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)5.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle7.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription88.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)30.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate72.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population5.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households56.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+33.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age53.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$49,316$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$154,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,141$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.7 yr ± 1.0278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.02 years of 76.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured