ZIP code
65747
in Shell Knob, MissouriPopulation 4,016
41.39/ 100
Ranked #25,757 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 20%)
Ranked #622 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 37%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Hearing disability
14.7%
in the top 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
12.8%
in the top 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
48.5%
in the top 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
25.4%
in the top 3.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST95thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Stroke
6.2%
in the top 3.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
51.1%
in the top 2.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Park land
44.7%
in the top 2.9% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST98thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.
Full methodology ›Pharmacy access
0.59 per 1,000 residents
in the top 3.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST97thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
11.0%
in the bottom 3.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Elder-services access
0.3 per 1,000 residents
in the top 4.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST94thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›The read
Shell Knob, Missouri (ZIP 65747), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 20% nationally (25,757th) and the bottom 37% of Missouri (622nd).
The data opens on real and measurable burdens: modeled hearing disability settles in the top 0.5% nationally, and coronary heart disease sits in the top 0.9% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol lies in the top 0.7% nationally, and mobility disability rests in the top 3.0% nationally. Modeled stroke resides in the top 3.2% nationally, and high blood pressure is in the top 2.5% nationally. More encouragingly, park land lands in the top 2.9% nationally, pharmacy stands in the top 3.5% nationally, and modeled binge drinking registers in the bottom 3.1% nationally. Elder services settles in the top 4.6% nationally.
Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 65658, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 67%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 84%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 74%
8%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 57%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 49%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 2%
21%
Disability
healthier than 8%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 21%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 34%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 63%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 62%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 95%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 86%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 96%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
in the bottom 0.5%
21%
Disability
healthier than 11%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 13%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 34%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Clean environment, heavy chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 67.1; chronic-disease standing 1.7 (bottom 10%) — 65 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #1,358 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
65605
Missourishares a border
Score 37.38
Closest healthier
65658
Missourishares a border
Score 46.33
Similar health profile
32664
Florida99% similar profile
Score 44.56
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 44.6% | 41.5–47.9 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 51.1% | 47.7–54.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 14.4% | 13.4–15.5 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.4% | 9.5–11.5 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 12.8% | 11.7–13.9 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 14.0% | 12.6–15.5 |
| Depression among adults | 22.2% | 19.7–25.0 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 18.8% | 16.9–20.8 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 48.5% | 44.9–52.3 |
| Obesity among adults | 38.7% | 33.1–44.8 |
| Stroke among adults | 6.2% | 5.8–6.7 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 20.1% | 17.5–22.8 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 8.5% | 7.3–9.9 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 86.3% | 84.4–88.0 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 84.3% | 82.2–86.3 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 90.1% | 89.0–91.1 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 68.9% | 65.1–72.4 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 57.4% | 54.5–60.3 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 74.4% | 68.5–79.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 11.0% | 9.4–12.7 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 18.3% | 16.2–20.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 36.7% | 32.7–41.0 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 34.2% | 29.4–39.1 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 27.1% | 24.5–29.9 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 14.7% | 13.4–16.2 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 19.0% | 17.3–20.9 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 16.5% | 15.0–18.2 |
| Any disability among adults | 45.3% | 41.6–49.1 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 14.7% | 13.4–16.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 11.1% | 10.1–12.2 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 25.4% | 23.0–28.0 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.7% | 5.3–6.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 7.0% | 6.4–7.6 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 18.0% | 15.8–20.5 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.8% | 11.2–14.6 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 10.8% | 9.4–12.5 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 9.1% | 8.0–10.3 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 7.3% | 6.6–8.1 |
| Loneliness among adults | 29.0% | 25.5–32.8 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 7.1% | 6.3–7.9 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MO median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 12.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 12.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 13.7% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 13.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 8.7% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 17.3% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 18.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 7.4% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 2.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003 |
| Households without a vehicle | 1.9% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009 |
| Broadband subscription | 81.7% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 86.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 21.8% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 20.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009 |
| Homeownership rate | 88.4% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 79.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 1.4% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009 |
| Foreign-born population | 3.1% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010 |
| Single-parent households | 80.1% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 55.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005 |
| Population 65+ | 40.9% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010 |
| Median age | 61.0 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005 |
| Median household income | $55,060 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948 |
| Median home value | $289,900 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930 |
| Median gross rent | $681 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $813 ($553–$1,265) n=786 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MO median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 76.5 yr ± 1.13 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.13 years of 76.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured