Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33825

in Avon Park, FloridaPopulation 25,501

41.41/ 100

Ranked #25,738 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranked #846 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 13.2%)

Too few scored ZIPs in the Sebring, FL metro area to rank within it.

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

205.2 days/year

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

20.5%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.1%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

8.7 ppb

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

US96th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

19%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

45.3%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.6%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.9%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

8.6%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Avon Park, Florida (ZIP 33825) sits in the bottom 20% nationally (25,738th) and the bottom 13.2% of Florida (846th).

continue reading

The profile carries real weight, and several readings make that plain: modeled humid heat sits in the top 0.3% nationally, disaster risk stands in the top 1.4% nationally, and uninsured resides in the top 4.1% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease sits in the top 3.9% nationally, lead in tap water stands in the top 4.5% nationally, and modeled diabetes resides in the top 5.6% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol sits in the top 3.8% nationally, and stroke stands in the top 6.9% nationally. Modeled vision disability resides in the top 9.2% nationally. Better still, modeled binge drinking sits in the bottom 6.3% nationally.

Put plainly, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 33870, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Sebring, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.0 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $46,949 predicts 77.1 years — 2.9 years above.

    Ranked #468 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 82.5; chronic-disease standing 8.2 (bottom 10%) — 74 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #805 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.7%32.9–38.7
High blood pressure among adults45.9%42.6–49.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.2%10.3–12.2
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.9–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults11.1%10.2–12.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.2%10.2–12.3
Depression among adults17.3%15.0–19.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.0%17.1–21.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.3%41.8–48.8
Obesity among adults39.6%34.8–44.5
Stroke among adults5.6%5.2–6.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.0%16.2–22.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years20.5%18.5–22.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.6%79.4–83.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%77.9–83.0
Cholesterol screening among adults86.5%85.1–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.6%61.6–69.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.8%47.8–53.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.6%68.4–80.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.9%10.1–13.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.8%14.9–18.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.3%31.6–39.2
Short sleep duration among adults38.6%34.5–42.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.4%25.8–31.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%15.6–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults18.3%16.5–20.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.2%14.7–17.9
Any disability among adults39.6%36.2–43.2
Hearing disability among adults10.9%9.9–12.0
Independent living disability among adults10.9%9.9–12.0
Mobility disability among adults21.9%19.7–24.1
Self-care disability among adults6.1%5.6–6.6
Vision disability among adults8.6%8.0–9.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6425.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)16.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)6.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle5.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription87.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate74.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population10.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households58.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+33.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age50.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$46,949$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$161,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$927$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 0.7778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.77 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured