Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33411

in Royal Palm Beach, FloridaPopulation 76,863

59.24/ 100

Ranked #5,416 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #211 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #78 of 183 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

89%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

197.6 days/year

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

1,353 units

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

0.99%

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

26.9%

in the bottom 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

35.8%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST57th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

0.96 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST81st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

In overall standing, Royal Palm Beach, Florida (ZIP 33411) comes out in the top 17% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,416th) and the top 22% of Florida (211th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 0.8% nationally, modeled arsenic is in the bottom 2.0% nationally, and modeled obesity resides in the bottom 8.9% nationally. Recreation rests in the top 9.7% nationally, and park land lies in the top 10.7% nationally. By contrast, modeled pfas sits in the top 0.5% nationally, and humid heat settles in the top 0.6% nationally. Floodplain exposure registers in the top 7.6% nationally, and modeled disaster risk stands in the top 7.9% nationally. Modeled tree cover lands in the bottom 12.2% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, subsidized affordable housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 33412, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.0%23.4–28.7
High blood pressure among adults33.4%30.2–36.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%7.9–9.5
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.4–10.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.8–7.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.2%5.5–6.8
Depression among adults15.7%13.5–18.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.5%11.1–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.1%32.7–39.7
Obesity among adults26.9%22.4–31.9
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.4%9.3–13.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.7%12.2–15.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.0%76.3–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.0%75.9–81.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.6%86.2–89.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.7%63.0–72.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.2%57.6–64.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.2%71.4–83.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.7%11.5–16.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.2%9.7–12.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.1%20.9–27.6
Short sleep duration among adults36.7%31.7–41.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.1%16.1–20.3
Frequent mental distress among adults15.1%13.5–16.8
Frequent physical distress among adults12.8%11.4–14.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.7%11.4–14.1
Any disability among adults28.5%25.3–31.9
Hearing disability among adults6.6%6.0–7.4
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.6–8.1
Mobility disability among adults13.3%11.8–15.0
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.3–3.9
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.8–5.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6411.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)7.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)41.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)3.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle3.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription92.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate79.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population27.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households51.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+22.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age43.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$92,591$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$441,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$2,002$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.8 yr ± 0.6078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.60 years of 80.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured