Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33150

in Miami, FloridaPopulation 30,974

35.34/ 100

Ranked #29,259 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 8.8%)

Ranked #939 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 3.6%)

Ranked #180 of 183 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL ZIPs (bottom 1.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Vision disability

13.1%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

27.1%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

9.0%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

32.1%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

46.8%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

189.1 days/year

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST64th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

20.8%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

33.5%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

14.2%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

210 intersections/sq mi

in the top 2.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 33150, one of several in Miami, Florida, by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 8.8% nationally (29,259th) and the bottom 3.6% of Florida (939th).

continue reading

The data is direct about where this area carries real strain: modeled vision disability registers in the top 1.2% nationally, uninsured stands in the top 1.8% nationally, and self-care disability lands in the top 1.5% nationally. Modeled tooth loss is in the top 2.1% nationally, short sleep resides in the top 1.5% nationally, and humid heat rests in the top 1.1% nationally. Modeled diabetes lies in the top 2.7% nationally, and fair or poor health sits in the top 3.8% nationally. Modeled independent living disability settles in the top 3.8% nationally. More encouragingly, walkability registers in the top 2.2% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 33127, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 1%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 1%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.8 ± 1.8 years. The 43 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.6 years — 4.8 years below them.

    Ranked #3,335 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.7%23.0–28.3
High blood pressure among adults44.1%40.7–47.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.2–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults9.1%8.2–9.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.3%9.3–11.3
Depression among adults15.4%13.1–17.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults20.8%18.6–22.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.6%32.2–39.0
Obesity among adults37.9%32.6–43.3
Stroke among adults6.1%5.7–6.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years32.1%28.0–36.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years27.1%24.4–29.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.5%76.0–80.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.8%74.7–80.5
Cholesterol screening among adults82.6%80.6–84.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.2%51.5–60.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults38.9%35.9–42.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.2%66.2–79.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.9%10.0–14.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.8%18.3–23.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults42.3%38.1–46.5
Short sleep duration among adults46.8%42.2–51.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults33.5%30.3–36.5
Frequent mental distress among adults19.7%17.6–21.7
Frequent physical distress among adults19.0%17.0–20.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.3%18.3–22.3
Any disability among adults39.4%35.5–43.2
Hearing disability among adults7.2%6.4–7.9
Independent living disability among adults14.2%12.8–15.6
Mobility disability among adults23.3%21.0–25.6
Self-care disability among adults9.0%8.3–9.8
Vision disability among adults13.1%12.1–14.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate29.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6430.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)25.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)7.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle23.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription78.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)48.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate29.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)9.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population41.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households26.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+15.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age37.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$40,873$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$453,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,200$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.8 yr ± 0.9378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.93 years of 74.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured