Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33127

in Miami, FloridaPopulation 26,786

41.58/ 100

Ranked #25,587 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranked #841 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 13.7%)

Ranked #172 of 183 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL ZIPs (bottom 6.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

31.4%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

12.6%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

1,553 units

in the top 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.1%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

31.9%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

240 intersections/sq mi

in the top 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

57.4%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

28.5%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, ZIP 33127, one of several in Miami, Florida ranks in the bottom 20% nationally (25,587th) and the bottom 13.7% of Florida (841st).

continue reading

Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: modeled uninsured is in the top 0.9% nationally, and vision disability settles in the top 1.6% nationally. Modeled self-care disability resides in the top 2.6% nationally, and transportation noise registers in the top 1.1% nationally. Housing-cost burden rests in the top 1.5% nationally, PFOA in drinking water stands at the national maximum, and modeled tooth loss lies in the top 4.1% nationally. PFOS in drinking water lands at the national maximum. On the better side, subsidized affordable housing sits in the top 0.6% nationally, and walkability is in the top 1.4% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Close by, ZIP 33125, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 81%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.6%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 99%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.7 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $41,230 predicts 76.6 years — 1.9 years below.

    Ranked #2,509 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.7 ± 1.2 years. The 43 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.8 years — 5.2 years below them.

    Ranked #3,418 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.2%20.8–25.7
High blood pressure among adults39.9%36.7–43.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.3–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.5–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.8%7.9–9.7
Depression among adults15.1%12.9–17.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.2%17.2–21.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.2%31.9–38.6
Obesity among adults35.9%30.9–41.3
Stroke among adults5.2%4.9–5.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years28.5%24.7–32.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years31.4%28.2–34.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.7%74.1–79.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.4%72.1–78.4
Cholesterol screening among adults81.6%79.5–83.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years54.6%49.9–59.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults40.2%37.1–43.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.1%63.8–78.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.2%11.0–15.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.7%16.5–21.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults41.5%37.4–45.8
Short sleep duration among adults44.4%39.9–49.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults32.4%29.5–35.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.7%16.9–20.7
Frequent physical distress among adults18.4%16.6–20.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.8%17.9–21.8
Any disability among adults38.1%34.4–41.9
Hearing disability among adults7.2%6.4–8.0
Independent living disability among adults12.9%11.7–14.2
Mobility disability among adults21.4%19.2–23.6
Self-care disability among adults8.1%7.4–8.8
Vision disability among adults12.6%11.6–13.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate34.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6433.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)28.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)10.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle24.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription75.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)57.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate26.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)10.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population43.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households28.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+15.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age37.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$41,230$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$408,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,455$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.7 yr ± 0.6178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.61 years of 74.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured