Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33034

in Florida City, FloridaPopulation 23,823

35.21/ 100

Ranked #29,311 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 8.6%)

Ranked #940 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 3.5%)

Ranked #181 of 183 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL ZIPs (bottom 1.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

34.3%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

14.1%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

9.2%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

212.2 days/year

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

50.7%

in the bottom 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

1,326 units

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

35.2%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

29.6%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

14.7%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

0.74 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Florida City, Florida (ZIP 33034), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 8.6% nationally (29,311th) and the bottom 3.5% of Florida (940th).

continue reading

A demanding profile, and several measures drive it: modeled uninsured resides in the top 0.6% nationally, vision disability sits in the top 0.8% nationally, and self-care disability stands in the top 1.3% nationally. Modeled humid heat resides in the top 0.2% nationally, colon screening sits in the bottom 2.3% nationally, and fair or poor health stands in the top 2.6% nationally. Modeled tooth loss resides in the top 3.4% nationally, and independent living disability sits in the top 3.0% nationally. Walkability stands in the bottom 1.7% nationally. On the stronger side, subsidized affordable housing resides in the top 0.8% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, subsidized affordable housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 33030, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 99%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 1%

11%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 1%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.5%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 1%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 1%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 1%

8%

Disability

healthier than 1%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.8 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $47,170 predicts 77.1 years — 2.3 years below.

    Ranked #3,121 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.8 ± 1.3 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 81.5 years — 6.7 years below them.

    Ranked #3,616 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 98.5 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 32.0 — 67 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,296 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.8%20.4–25.4
High blood pressure among adults39.1%35.8–42.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.5–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults8.6%7.9–9.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.2%9.3–11.2
Depression among adults16.5%14.2–19.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.0%17.1–21.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.8%31.5–38.2
Obesity among adults36.8%31.7–42.2
Stroke among adults5.2%4.9–5.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years29.6%25.7–33.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years34.3%31.0–37.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.8%72.0–77.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.9%70.5–77.1
Cholesterol screening among adults78.9%76.7–81.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years50.7%46.1–55.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults36.3%33.4–39.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.1%61.5–76.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.5%11.3–15.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.5%20.1–25.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults43.9%39.8–48.2
Short sleep duration among adults45.1%40.5–49.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults35.2%32.3–38.4
Frequent mental distress among adults20.5%18.5–22.6
Frequent physical distress among adults19.9%18.0–22.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.3%20.3–24.5
Any disability among adults40.3%36.5–44.2
Hearing disability among adults7.8%7.0–8.6
Independent living disability among adults14.7%13.4–16.2
Mobility disability among adults22.2%20.1–24.5
Self-care disability among adults9.2%8.4–9.9
Vision disability among adults14.1%13.0–15.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate31.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6437.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)32.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)5.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle10.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription88.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)52.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate35.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)9.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population35.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households30.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+12.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age32.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$47,170$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$339,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,380$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.8 yr ± 0.6678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.66 years of 74.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured