Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32680

in Old Town, FloridaPopulation 10,582

35.36/ 100

Ranked #29,253 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 8.8%)

Ranked #938 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 3.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

175 days/year

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST33rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

61.8%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

11.5%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

26.1 mi

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.6%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

22.7%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.2%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST44th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

73.7%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

3.8%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Old Town, Florida (ZIP 32680) ranks in the bottom 8.8% nationally (29,253rd) and the bottom 3.7% of Florida (938th).

continue reading

The burdens that read clearest in the data come first: modeled humid heat resides in the top 2.0% nationally, and floodplain exposure lands in the top 2.4% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease registers in the top 2.8% nationally, and distance to an emergency room sits in the top 2.7% nationally. Modeled stroke rests in the top 6.9% nationally, mobility disability is in the top 7.5% nationally, and hearing disability stands in the top 8.0% nationally. Home broadband subscription settles in the bottom 8.6% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure lies in the top 9.2% nationally. Better still, modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 8.3% nationally.

In plainer terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 32008, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 1.0%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.3 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $50,306 predicts 77.4 years — 3.1 years below.

    Ranked #4,198 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 81.2; chronic-disease standing 6.8 (bottom 10%) — 74 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #796 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.1%34.5–41.9
High blood pressure among adults44.9%40.8–49.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.7%10.6–12.9
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.5–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults11.5%10.4–12.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.8%12.3–15.4
Depression among adults21.2%18.0–24.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.1%15.0–19.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.0%38.6–47.3
Obesity among adults34.6%28.4–41.2
Stroke among adults5.6%5.2–6.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.8%18.1–25.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.5%12.4–16.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.7%79.0–84.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.3%74.8–81.6
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%83.9–87.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.6%59.5–69.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults46.4%42.6–50.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.1%60.8–76.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.2%10.8–15.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.8%18.3–23.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.1%28.7–38.0
Short sleep duration among adults39.2%33.1–45.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.2%24.1–30.7
Frequent mental distress among adults19.3%17.3–21.5
Frequent physical distress among adults19.8%17.7–22.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.1%16.2–20.3
Any disability among adults42.4%38.1–47.1
Hearing disability among adults11.2%10.1–12.6
Independent living disability among adults11.5%10.3–12.9
Mobility disability among adults22.7%20.1–25.6
Self-care disability among adults6.1%5.4–6.7
Vision disability among adults7.8%7.1–8.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6424.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)14.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)2.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle2.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription73.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate86.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population2.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households58.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+27.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age52.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$50,306$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$124,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$826$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.3 yr ± 0.7678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.76 years of 74.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured