Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33068

in North Lauderdale, FloridaPopulation 54,439

50.15/ 100

Ranked #16,026 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranked #577 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #142 of 183 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Outer-floodplain exposure

61.7%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

45.9%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

50.3%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

19.1%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

532 units

in the top 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

120 intersections/sq mi

in the top 8.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, North Lauderdale, Florida (ZIP 33068) places in the top 50% healthiest ZIPs nationally (16,026th) and the bottom 41% of Florida (577th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: subsidized affordable housing settles in the top 4.1% nationally, and walkability sits in the top 8.3% nationally. Pulling the other way, outer-floodplain exposure lies in the top 0.8% nationally, and modeled short sleep rests in the top 2.1% nationally. PFOA in drinking water resides at the national maximum, PFOS in drinking water is at the national maximum, and housing-cost burden lands in the top 3.0% nationally. Modeled uninsured stands in the top 5.3% nationally, modeled tree cover registers at the national minimum, and PFAS in drinking water settles at the national maximum.

Beside the areas that surround it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 33063, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 55%

16%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 15%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.5%19.1–23.9
High blood pressure among adults37.0%33.6–40.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.6–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.2–6.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%6.1–7.5
Depression among adults16.4%14.0–19.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.1%12.4–15.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.3%30.8–37.7
Obesity among adults35.2%29.8–40.6
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.8%14.1–19.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.1%16.7–21.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.0%72.1–77.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.6%75.3–81.5
Cholesterol screening among adults84.1%82.4–85.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.2%55.8–64.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.9%46.6–53.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.5%70.2–82.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.3%11.0–15.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.7%13.7–17.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.6%26.6–34.6
Short sleep duration among adults45.9%41.0–51.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.9%22.2–27.7
Frequent mental distress among adults19.5%17.4–21.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.3–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.7%15.0–18.6
Any disability among adults31.9%28.3–35.7
Hearing disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.7
Independent living disability among adults10.2%9.2–11.3
Mobility disability among adults16.1%14.3–18.1
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.9–5.8
Vision disability among adults7.8%7.2–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6423.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)14.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)5.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle5.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription95.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)50.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate62.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population47.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households39.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+12.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age37.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$64,051$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$327,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$2,053$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.2 yr ± 0.6878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.68 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured