Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33066

in Coconut Creek, FloridaPopulation 16,719

56.04/ 100

Ranked #8,229 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #326 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #99 of 183 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

193.8 days/year

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

26.4%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

2.6%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

45.8%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.6%

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Park land

20.3%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

94%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

94%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

27.3%

in the bottom 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, ZIP 33066, one of several in Coconut Creek, Florida ranks in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,229th) and the top 33% of Florida (326th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: modeled binge drinking stands in the bottom 4.9% nationally, and park land lies in the top 6.9% nationally. Modeled obesity lands in the bottom 9.8% nationally. On the other side, modeled humid heat sits in the top 0.7% nationally, outer-floodplain exposure is in the top 1.6% nationally, and slow internet speeds settles in the top 4.5% nationally. Modeled tree cover resides at the national minimum, housing-cost burden registers in the top 5.0% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water rests in the top 7.0% nationally. PFOS in drinking water stands in the top 7.2% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Close by, ZIP 33073, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 93.7 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 34.3 — 59 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,781 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.9%28.7–35.2
High blood pressure among adults41.5%37.8–45.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.9%11.8–14.1
Current asthma among adults9.2%8.1–10.3
Coronary heart disease among adults9.5%8.4–10.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.5–9.9
Depression among adults15.9%13.5–18.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.4%12.5–16.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.8%39.9–47.6
Obesity among adults27.3%22.6–32.2
Stroke among adults4.7%4.3–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.6%8.7–12.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.3%12.5–16.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.7%81.3–85.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.0%80.2–85.4
Cholesterol screening among adults90.5%89.2–91.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.6%66.6–74.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.6%58.4–64.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.6%71.2–83.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.6%9.6–13.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.7%9.1–12.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.3%22.5–30.3
Short sleep duration among adults35.0%30.7–39.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.4%17.8–23.1
Frequent mental distress among adults14.1%12.5–15.8
Frequent physical distress among adults15.1%13.3–17.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.0%10.6–13.5
Any disability among adults32.5%28.6–36.3
Hearing disability among adults9.9%8.8–11.1
Independent living disability among adults8.3%7.3–9.4
Mobility disability among adults18.1%15.6–20.6
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.8
Vision disability among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6410.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)8.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)37.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)6.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle9.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription86.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)45.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate83.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population30.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households51.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+39.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age58.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$57,051$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$225,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,724$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured