Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33326

in Weston, FloridaPopulation 33,880

65.98/ 100

Ranked #1,633 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 5.1%)

Ranked #31 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 3.2%)

Ranked #19 of 183 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL ZIPs (top 10.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

207.2 days/year

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

56.2%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.59 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

9.9 µg/L

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

98.3%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

27%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Judged by its overall standing, ZIP 33326, one of several in Weston, Florida sits in the top 5.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,633rd) and the top 3.2% of Florida (31st).

continue reading

An even profile, with readings pulling both ways: recreation is in the top 3.7% nationally, physicians lies in the top 5.0% nationally, and outpatient registers in the top 5.7% nationally. Dental providers is in the top 6.3% nationally, lithium in drinking water lies in the bottom 6.3% nationally, and home broadband subscription registers in the top 6.9% nationally. Modeled obesity is in the bottom 9.2% nationally. Against that, modeled humid heat lies in the top 0.3% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure registers in the top 0.9% nationally. Modeled tree cover is at the national minimum.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 33327, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 90%

8%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 39%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 77%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 84.0 ± 1.9 years. A median household income of $117,373 predicts 80.7 years — 3.3 years above.

    Ranked #336 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 84.0 ± 1.9 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.8 years — 4.2 years above them.

    Ranked #284 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.8%17.5–22.2
High blood pressure among adults29.4%26.2–32.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.2%6.5–7.9
Current asthma among adults8.0%7.1–9.0
Coronary heart disease among adults5.0%4.5–5.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.0%3.5–4.4
Depression among adults14.8%12.6–17.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.0%9.5–12.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.1%33.4–40.7
Obesity among adults27.0%22.4–31.7
Stroke among adults2.5%2.3–2.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.4%5.2–7.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.0%13.0–17.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.3%73.0–79.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.5%75.2–81.4
Cholesterol screening among adults89.3%87.9–90.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.3%60.0–68.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.5%64.5–70.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.8%72.7–84.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.6%13.0–18.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.7%6.6–8.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.0%17.9–24.2
Short sleep duration among adults34.8%30.4–39.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.8%13.9–17.7
Frequent mental distress among adults13.2%11.7–14.7
Frequent physical distress among adults11.5%10.2–12.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.2%9.1–11.4
Any disability among adults22.8%19.9–25.7
Hearing disability among adults5.4%4.9–6.1
Independent living disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.0
Mobility disability among adults10.8%9.4–12.1
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.7–3.2
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.3–5.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–646.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)3.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)57.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)2.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle1.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription98.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)37.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate72.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population49.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households43.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+14.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age41.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$117,373$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$573,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$2,506$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.0 yr ± 0.9978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.99 years of 84.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured