ZIP code
32757
in Mount Dora, FloridaPopulation 34,121
53.57/ 100
Ranked #11,260 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 35%)
Ranked #451 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 46%)
Ranked #57 of 92 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL ZIPs (bottom 38%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Humid extreme heat
190.7 days/year
in the top 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST68thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.
Full methodology ›Distance to a Superfund site
In this ZIP
at the national minimum
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.
Full methodology ›Subsidized affordable housing
291 units
in the top 8.5% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST81stUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.
Full methodology ›Dry extreme heat
11.5 days/year
in the top 33% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS67thDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.
Full methodology ›The read
In overall standing, Mount Dora, Florida (ZIP 32757) comes out in the top 35% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,260th) and the top 46% of Florida (451st).
The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: subsidized affordable housing settles in the top 8.5% nationally, physicians registers in the top 10.3% nationally, and outpatient stands in the top 10.4% nationally. Modeled arsenic lands in the bottom 11.5% nationally, and transit is in the top 12.9% nationally. Distance to a nursing home resides at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Modeled radon rests in the bottom 10.5% nationally. Set against that, modeled humid heat lies in the top 0.9% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site sits at the national minimum. Floodplain exposure settles in the top 13.8% nationally.
Relative to the ZIPs around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 32712, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 69%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 65%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 75%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 90%
8%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 59%
13%
Disability
healthier than 50%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 59%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 40%
21%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 10%
5%
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 70%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 70%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 69%
8%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 41%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 49%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 40%
14%
Disability
healthier than 56%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 54%
5%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 30%
5%
Lifting this score
Preventive Care
healthier than 81%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 74%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 69%
8%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 58%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 19%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 38%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 38%
14%
Disability
healthier than 33%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 30%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
32712
Floridashares a border
Score 56.61
Closest healthier
32776
Floridashares a border
Score 54.15
Similar health profile
32962
Florida99% similar profile
Score 54.02
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 30.9% | 28.4–33.7 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 39.5% | 36.4–42.8 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 11.4% | 10.5–12.4 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.6% | 8.7–10.7 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 8.5% | 7.8–9.3 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 8.1% | 7.3–9.0 |
| Depression among adults | 17.1% | 15.0–19.6 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 14.3% | 12.8–16.0 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 41.3% | 38.1–44.8 |
| Obesity among adults | 34.5% | 29.8–39.7 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.2% | 3.9–4.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 11.4% | 9.6–13.4 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 13.0% | 11.6–14.6 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 81.2% | 78.9–83.3 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 80.6% | 78.0–83.1 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 89.1% | 87.8–90.2 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 69.7% | 66.3–73.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 59.1% | 56.3–62.0 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 73.5% | 67.7–79.0 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.6% | 11.6–15.8 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 12.0% | 10.6–13.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 25.2% | 22.3–28.5 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 36.3% | 32.5–40.5 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 19.8% | 17.9–22.0 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 15.3% | 13.9–16.9 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 14.8% | 13.4–16.3 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 13.0% | 11.8–14.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 32.5% | 29.5–35.9 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 8.5% | 7.7–9.4 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 8.1% | 7.4–8.9 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 16.4% | 14.8–18.3 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 4.0% | 3.6–4.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.5% | 5.1–6.0 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | FL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 10.8% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 11.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 17.7% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 15.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 7.7% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 8.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 35.7% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 29.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 4.7% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968 |
| Households without a vehicle | 5.8% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972 |
| Broadband subscription | 93.1% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 91.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 35.5% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 33.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972 |
| Homeownership rate | 73.5% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 74.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 3.1% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 2.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972 |
| Foreign-born population | 10.8% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 11.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977 |
| Single-parent households | 56.9% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 52.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968 |
| Population 65+ | 27.7% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977 |
| Median age | 45.8 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972 |
| Median household income | $77,216 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946 |
| Median home value | $370,800 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932 |
| Median gross rent | $1,747 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | FL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 79.0 yr ± 0.91 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.91 years of 79.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured