Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33634

in Tampa, FloridaPopulation 21,862

53.64/ 100

Ranked #11,175 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranked #446 of 974 Florida ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranked #70 of 133 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

94.4%

in the top 0.08% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

22.6%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

182.1 days/year

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST46th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.65 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.33 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

14.2%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

38.9%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1 mi

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.51 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST80th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Overall, ZIP 33634, one of several in Tampa, Florida lands in the top 35% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,175th) and the top 46% of Florida (446th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: pharmacy sits in the top 2.8% nationally, and grocery is in the top 3.3% nationally. Outpatient settles in the top 7.5% nationally. On the other side, modeled pfas resides in the top 0.08% nationally, uninsured registers in the top 3.1% nationally, and humid heat rests in the top 1.6% nationally. Modeled transportation noise stands in the top 4.8% nationally, floodplain exposure lies in the top 6.6% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site lands in the bottom 7.2% nationally. Housing-cost burden sits in the top 10.2% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 33607, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.5%18.3–22.8
High blood pressure among adults33.1%30.0–36.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.1%5.5–6.6
Current asthma among adults8.7%7.8–9.8
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.3–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.7–5.9
Depression among adults15.3%13.2–17.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%12.1–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.5%36.1–43.0
Obesity among adults32.6%28.0–37.6
Stroke among adults3.1%2.8–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.7%9.6–13.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years22.6%19.9–25.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.8%70.8–76.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.2%71.8–78.3
Cholesterol screening among adults84.7%82.9–86.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.8%55.1–64.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.3%47.0–53.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.6%71.0–82.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%13.6–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.7%10.2–13.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.7%24.1–31.5
Short sleep duration among adults40.3%35.6–44.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.9%19.5–24.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.1%14.4–17.9
Frequent physical distress among adults13.9%12.4–15.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.3%12.8–16.0
Any disability among adults31.0%27.6–34.7
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.7–7.1
Independent living disability among adults7.8%7.0–8.7
Mobility disability among adults14.0%12.3–15.7
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
Vision disability among adults7.0%6.3–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6420.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)11.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)4.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle5.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription94.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)39.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate60.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population41.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households40.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+14.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age39.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$74,291$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$346,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,866$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.9 yr ± 0.7778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.77 years of 78.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured