Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32631

in Earleton, FloridaPopulation 343

44.47/ 100

Ranked #22,946 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranked #761 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranked #16 of 29 Gainesville, FL ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

174.4 days/year

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST33rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

66.9%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

45.4%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.7%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

13 mi

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST43rd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 10.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US10th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.29%

in the bottom 12.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

14.2 mi

in the top 12.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

The read

Earleton, Florida (ZIP 32631), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 28% nationally (22,946th) and the bottom 22% of Florida (761st).

continue reading

The main burdens in the data show plainly and lead the picture: modeled humid heat settles in the top 2.0% nationally, mammography stands in the bottom 5.3% nationally, and high cholesterol is in the top 3.7% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease rests in the top 5.6% nationally, and distance to a nursing home sits in the top 7.0% nationally. Fiber broadband registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. More positively, homeownership lands at the national maximum. Unemployment resides at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle lies at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled arsenic settles in the bottom 8.3% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 32666, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Gainesville, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.8%30.3–37.3
High blood pressure among adults42.9%38.8–46.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.8%10.6–13.1
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.8–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults10.7%9.3–12.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.7%9.6–14.0
Depression among adults20.0%17.1–23.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.0%13.7–18.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.4%41.4–49.6
Obesity among adults34.3%28.8–40.5
Stroke among adults5.0%4.3–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.5%15.2–22.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.2%10.7–16.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.8%79.3–84.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%76.9–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults86.9%85.1–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.2%64.6–73.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.6%47.1–53.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years66.9%59.2–74.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.7–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.2%14.0–20.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.7%22.3–31.5
Short sleep duration among adults35.4%30.7–40.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.6%19.9–27.7
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%15.0–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults17.2%14.7–19.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.7%13.5–18.1
Any disability among adults37.4%32.4–42.6
Hearing disability among adults10.7%9.3–12.1
Independent living disability among adults9.7%8.3–11.3
Mobility disability among adults19.0%15.8–22.3
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.4–6.3
Vision disability among adults6.6%5.6–7.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)3.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)39.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription94.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households85.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+23.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age60.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$224,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.9 yr ± 1.3178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.31 years of 76.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured