Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

32425

in Bonifay, FloridaPopulation 13,942

39.51/ 100

Ranked #27,080 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #891 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 8.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

43.5%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

148.9 days/year

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

34.1%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST53rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.14 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

76.4%

in the bottom 11.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US11th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

69.3%

in the bottom 11.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

15.8%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST65th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

21.9%

in the top 12.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

0.79%

in the top 13.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$46,667

in the bottom 10.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Bonifay, Florida (ZIP 32425), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 16% nationally (27,080th) and the bottom 8.6% of Florida (891st).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled arsenic is in the bottom 10.8% nationally, and elder services lands in the top 10.9% nationally. Distance to a community health center stands at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home registers at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, modeled short sleep settles in the top 5.5% nationally, modeled humid heat sits in the top 5.1% nationally, and floodplain exposure lies in the top 8.3% nationally. Home broadband subscription rests in the bottom 11.5% nationally, modeled mammography resides in the bottom 11.3% nationally, and modeled uninsured is in the top 9.6% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 32428, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.9 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $46,667 predicts 77.1 years — 3.2 years below.

    Ranked #4,302 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.9 ± 1.2 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.0 years — 2.1 years below them.

    Ranked #1,640 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 86.8; chronic-disease standing 20.0 — 67 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,277 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.9%28.2–33.7
High blood pressure among adults41.4%37.9–44.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.8–10.4
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.4–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.4–10.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.3%10.3–12.4
Depression among adults20.7%18.0–23.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.8%13.2–16.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.0%39.4–46.7
Obesity among adults37.0%31.5–42.8
Stroke among adults4.7%4.4–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.9%18.9–25.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.8%13.7–18.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.1%74.7–79.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.4%73.1–79.4
Cholesterol screening among adults82.9%81.0–84.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.3%56.0–64.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults47.2%43.8–50.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.3%62.4–75.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.4%13.0–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.7%17.5–22.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.3%26.5–34.1
Short sleep duration among adults43.5%38.4–48.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.5%22.9–28.1
Frequent mental distress among adults19.6%17.7–21.5
Frequent physical distress among adults17.4%15.6–19.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.1%16.4–19.9
Any disability among adults39.6%35.7–43.4
Hearing disability among adults9.4%8.6–10.4
Independent living disability among adults11.0%10.0–12.1
Mobility disability among adults18.8%16.9–20.7
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.9–5.7
Vision disability among adults7.1%6.5–7.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6419.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)15.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)5.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle4.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription76.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate75.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population2.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households50.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+22.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age44.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$46,667$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$123,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$875$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.9 yr ± 0.6278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.62 years of 73.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured