Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

39466

in Picayune, MississippiPopulation 28,025

41.58/ 100

Ranked #25,585 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranked #193 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

9.7 µg/L

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

145 days/year

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US91st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US90th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.7 pCi/L

in the bottom 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.39 per 1,000 residents

in the top 11.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US88th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Picayune, Mississippi (ZIP 39466) lands in the bottom 20% nationally (25,585th) and the top 48% of Mississippi (193rd).

continue reading

A number of measures mark where this area is under strain: distance to a Superfund site settles at the national minimum, and modeled humid heat resides in the top 6.1% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss registers in the top 8.7% nationally, and disaster risk rests in the top 9.8% nationally. Floodplain exposure stands in the top 10.2% nationally. On the brighter side, lithium in drinking water lies in the bottom 5.3% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Distance to a community health center sits at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled radon is in the bottom 4.5% nationally, and outpatient settles in the top 11.9% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 39426, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.8 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $52,765 predicts 77.6 years — 3.7 years below.

    Ranked #4,893 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.8 ± 1.1 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 75.8 years — 2.0 years below them.

    Ranked #1,560 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 89.2; chronic-disease standing 23.8 — 65 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,358 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.2%30.0–36.6
High blood pressure among adults44.3%40.4–48.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.9–9.4
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.9–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.6–9.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.1%9.1–11.2
Depression among adults21.2%18.2–24.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.6%13.8–17.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.5%36.5–44.8
Obesity among adults39.7%32.9–46.9
Stroke among adults4.8%4.4–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.1%16.0–22.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.3%10.7–14.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.8%78.4–83.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%77.5–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults85.7%84.0–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.7%56.0–65.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults8.9%7.7–10.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.9%64.6–78.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.8%11.5–16.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.2%17.0–21.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.4%30.9–40.1
Short sleep duration among adults40.5%34.8–46.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.9%23.2–28.7
Frequent mental distress among adults18.0%16.1–19.9
Frequent physical distress among adults16.5%14.8–18.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.7%17.0–20.7
Any disability among adults41.0%36.8–45.4
Hearing disability among adults9.6%8.6–10.6
Independent living disability among adults11.0%10.0–12.1
Mobility disability among adults20.3%18.2–22.5
Self-care disability among adults5.5%5.1–6.0
Vision disability among adults7.2%6.7–7.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.1%24.5–31.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.5%19.0–24.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.5%10.9–14.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.4%13.6–17.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.2%10.0–12.4
Loneliness among adults36.3%31.6–41.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.9–11.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–6419.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)13.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)5.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle4.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription83.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate74.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population2.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households46.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+17.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age40.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$52,765$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$173,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$910$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.8 yr ± 0.5478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.54 years of 73.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured