Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33851

in Lake Hamilton, FloridaPopulation 1,212

36.29/ 100

Ranked #28,864 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.0%)

Ranked #933 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 4.3%)

Ranked #35 of 38 Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL ZIPs (bottom 7.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

22%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

190.6 days/year

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST68th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

45.1%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

65.6%

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

34.4%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.2%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST32nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

99.1%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

33.1%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST51st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

8.6%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57.6%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Lake Hamilton, Florida (ZIP 33851), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 10.0% nationally (28,864th) and the bottom 4.3% of Florida (933rd).

continue reading

The measures that matter most for this area lead the way: modeled uninsured resides in the top 3.4% nationally, and humid heat is in the top 0.9% nationally. Modeled short sleep lands in the top 3.0% nationally, and mammography stands in the bottom 3.5% nationally. Poverty registers in the top 4.7% nationally, floodplain exposure settles in the top 8.7% nationally, and modeled vision disability sits in the top 9.2% nationally. On the better side, modeled arsenic lies in the bottom 5.8% nationally, and home broadband subscription rests in the top 5.9% nationally. Households without a vehicle resides at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 33844, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.2%26.5–32.1
High blood pressure among adults38.2%34.8–41.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.1%7.4–9.0
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.5–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults8.6%7.7–9.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.2%8.8–11.7
Depression among adults21.0%18.2–24.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.4%13.6–17.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.0%37.5–44.5
Obesity among adults43.4%38.1–48.9
Stroke among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.1%15.3–21.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years22.0%18.7–25.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.6%75.0–80.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.3%73.1–79.4
Cholesterol screening among adults83.0%80.8–85.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.6%52.9–62.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults45.7%42.3–49.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years65.6%57.5–73.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.8%12.5–17.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.1%16.1–22.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.4%28.9–37.9
Short sleep duration among adults45.1%40.3–50.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.2%24.6–31.9
Frequent mental distress among adults20.2%18.0–22.4
Frequent physical distress among adults18.8%16.5–21.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.9%16.6–21.3
Any disability among adults40.9%36.4–45.4
Hearing disability among adults8.9%7.9–9.9
Independent living disability among adults11.5%10.0–13.0
Mobility disability among adults19.9%17.3–22.5
Self-care disability among adults5.9%5.2–6.7
Vision disability among adults8.6%7.6–9.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate34.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6423.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)25.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)0.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription99.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)37.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate89.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population22.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households40.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+20.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age40.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$62,284$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$236,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,273$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.1 yr ± 2.4778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (74.6–82.2) n=894

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.47 years of 81.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured