Skip to main content
ZipVitals

How the Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC metro's ZIP codes measure up on health

The ZipVitals Score across the Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC metro area — built one ZIP code at a time, then rolled up by resident population.

Data release 202643 of 44 ZIP codes scored · 0.62M residents represented

Score snapshot

49.59Metro-wide ZipVitals Scorepopulation-weighted average of its ZIP codes
45.88Median scoremiddle of 43 scored ZIPs
62.78Highest score30809 · Evans
23.25Lowest score30901 · Augusta
39.53Spreadpoints between highest & lowest ZIP

People & national context

#228Among 386 metrosby population-weighted average
57%Residents in below-average ZIPs0.35M of 0.62M, in ZIPs scoring under the national average (53.48)
0.62MResidents in the top 50 ZIPs100% of the metro
0.62MResidents in the bottom 50 ZIPs100% of the metro
0ZIPs in the national top 100

The Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC metro's ZIP codes, ranked

Highest-scoring

Top 43 of 43
  1. 3,09030809in Evans · 54,743 residents62.78
  2. 4,94429860in North Augusta · 18,201 residents59.88
  3. 5,15229803in Aiken · 40,699 residents59.60
  4. 6,36630907in Augusta · 46,975 residents58.03
  5. 8,68930813in Grovetown · 52,466 residents55.65
  6. 8,87230802in Appling · 6,582 residents55.50
  7. 9,07130909in Augusta · 46,501 residents55.31
  8. 11,31829809in New Ellenton · 2,301 residents53.54
  9. 11,53930905in Augusta · 7,033 residents53.37
  10. 11,80530814in Harlem · 10,682 residents53.19
  11. 13,82229841in North Augusta · 32,342 residents51.71
  12. 16,65029856in Windsor · 3,272 residents49.70
  13. 17,86329847in Trenton · 5,554 residents48.85
  14. 18,01429829in Graniteville · 12,385 residents48.74
  15. 18,35129821in Clarks Hill · 1,141 residents48.46
  16. 18,84529805in Aiken · 4,935 residents48.06
  17. 18,90129164in Wagener · 4,830 residents48.02
  18. 20,10330815in Hephzibah · 44,109 residents47.05
  19. 20,16529831in Jackson · 4,394 residents47.00
  20. 20,94229851in Warrenville · 9,070 residents46.34
  21. 21,38929828in Gloverville · 489 residents45.97
  22. 21,47229801in Aiken · 31,108 residents45.88
  23. 22,00329842in Beech Island · 8,102 residents45.39
  24. 22,01029838in Modoc · 830 residents45.38
  25. 22,42830824in Thomson · 17,327 residents44.98
  26. 23,08330805in Blythe · 2,585 residents44.33
  27. 23,12830456in Sardis · 1,745 residents44.29
  28. 23,31030426in Girard · 703 residents44.11
  29. 23,47029129in Ridge Spring · 4,605 residents43.94
  30. 23,49429105in Monetta · 1,621 residents43.92
  31. 23,83830817in Lincolnton · 7,560 residents43.56
  32. 24,69230904in Augusta · 23,400 residents42.65
  33. 24,72030830in Waynesboro · 15,313 residents42.61
  34. 25,57729137in Perry · 2,248 residents41.59
  35. 25,75529824in Edgefield · 7,789 residents41.39
  36. 26,04230812in Gracewood · 136 residents40.98
  37. 27,58129834in Langley · 259 residents38.72
  38. 27,74029816in Burnettown · 1,092 residents38.47
  39. 28,20130808in Dearing · 4,127 residents37.67
  40. 28,21130816in Keysville · 2,208 residents37.65
  41. 29,14429832in Johnston · 5,074 residents35.61
  42. 30,04730906in Augusta · 60,423 residents32.98
  43. 31,63730901in Augusta · 16,484 residents23.25
Open the full Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC metro ranking →One page, all 43 scored ZIPs — sortable by score, residents, or place

Where each domain sits inside this metro

The Score above is one number for the whole Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC metro. Nine domains make it up, and they are not spread the same way across the people who live here. Each row divides this metro's ZIP codes into fifths by how they stand against each other on that domain, then counts who lives at each end. If a domain were spread evenly across the metro's residents, every row would read about 20%.

The highest-standing fifth

9 of 43 ZIPs

Share of the metro's residents living in the fifth of its ZIP codes that stand highest on each domain.

Healthcare Access54%337,660 people

4 ZIP codes tie at this end: 29801 Aiken30824 Thomson30904 Augusta30909 Augusta

Disability46%283,882 people

Standing highest: 29860 North Augusta30809 Evans30813 Grovetown

Chronic Disease Burden45%281,328 people

Standing highest: 30809 Evans30813 Grovetown30905 Augusta

Risk Behavior45%277,679 people

Standing highest: 29803 Aiken30809 Evans30907 Augusta

Social Need / SDOH29%180,342 people

Standing highest: 29828 Gloverville29860 North Augusta30809 Evans

Mental Health28%174,734 people

Standing highest: 29803 Aiken30809 Evans30812 Gracewood

Preventive Care28%171,608 people

Standing highest: 29803 Aiken29860 North Augusta30812 Gracewood

Climate / Disaster Risk6%34,426 people

Standing highest: 29105 Monetta29832 Johnston29847 Trenton

Environmental Hazard5%29,534 people

Standing highest: 29137 Perry30426 Girard30456 Sardis

Each fifth is about 9 of this metro’s 43 compared ZIP codes, and the shares are out of 623,443 residents. A ZIP code is compared here only if it carries a resident count to weight it by and enough measured data on that domain — the rest are left out of that domain’s fifths rather than filled in from a coarser geography, which is why this count can sit just below the metro’s scored total.

The mark shows 20% — where a row would sit if that domain were spread evenly across the metro's residents.

Each ZIP code is compared with the other ZIP codes in this metro that are measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain.

Why this matters

The ZipVitals Score combines nine domains of health — from chronic disease and preventive care to environmental hazard, social need, and healthcare access — into one 0–100 index for each ZIP code, computed the same way everywhere from public federal and academic data. The Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC figures on this page are population-weighted rollups of those per-ZIP scores, so they describe the metro's residents rather than a coarser geography relabeled as the metro.

A high score describes favorable documented conditions; it is not a claim about individual residents, and it does not capture everything that shapes a community's health. Where a ZIP code scores low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.