Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

36582

in Theodore, AlabamaPopulation 23,705

43.07/ 100

Ranked #24,314 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranked #301 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranked #19 of 35 Mobile, AL ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

513 units

in the top 4.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

7.0%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

141 days/year

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

52.6%

in the top 11.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US88th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.9 pCi/L

in the bottom 12.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Theodore, Alabama (ZIP 36582) ranks in the bottom 24% nationally (24,314th) and the top 49% of Alabama (301st).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: subsidized affordable housing resides in the top 4.3% nationally, and modeled radon stands in the bottom 12.3% nationally. Lithium in drinking water sits in the bottom 15% nationally. Working the other way, outer-floodplain exposure resides in the top 5.4% nationally, modeled humid heat stands in the top 7.1% nationally, and modeled disaster risk sits in the top 8.2% nationally. Modeled pfas resides in the top 11.8% nationally, expected annual loss stands in the top 12.6% nationally, and food insecurity sits in the top 15% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Against its neighbors, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 36541, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Mobile, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Disability

healthier than 50%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.5 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $64,763 predicts 78.4 years — 3.8 years below.

    Ranked #4,960 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.4%27.6–33.3
High blood pressure among adults42.7%39.4–46.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.5–9.0
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.7–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.9%7.1–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.3%8.3–10.4
Depression among adults24.0%21.1–27.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.1%14.3–18.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.6%38.3–45.1
Obesity among adults38.9%34.4–43.8
Stroke among adults4.4%4.0–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.8%14.9–21.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.1%9.6–12.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.8%76.3–81.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.4%75.2–81.4
Cholesterol screening among adults84.3%82.4–86.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.7%59.3–68.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.7%47.2–54.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.1%68.8–80.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.2%11.9–16.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.1%15.7–20.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.2%28.4–36.1
Short sleep duration among adults40.2%35.9–44.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.8%22.1–27.4
Frequent mental distress among adults18.3%16.3–20.4
Frequent physical distress among adults15.5%13.8–17.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.4%15.5–19.3
Any disability among adults37.9%34.2–41.7
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.9–9.8
Independent living disability among adults11.0%9.8–12.2
Mobility disability among adults18.8%16.7–21.0
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.7
Vision disability among adults6.7%6.1–7.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.1%24.0–30.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.3%19.9–24.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.0%15.0–19.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.3%13.5–17.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.9–12.4
Loneliness among adults34.4%30.6–38.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.4–12.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6422.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)11.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle4.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription87.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate79.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population3.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households56.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+17.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age42.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$64,763$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$184,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$889$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.5 yr ± 0.5078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.50 years of 74.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured