Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30576

in Tiger, GeorgiaPopulation 3,380

50.69/ 100

Ranked #15,288 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranked #255 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

0.87%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

5.1%

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.76 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Park land

44.1%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

81.1%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

43.5%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

31%

in the bottom 14.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US14th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

13.5%

in the bottom 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

0.40%

in the bottom 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

0 days/year

in the bottom 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US20th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Tiger, Georgia (ZIP 30576) ranks in the top 48% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,288th) and the top 36% of Georgia (255th).

continue reading

Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: modeled arsenic settles in the bottom 0.7% nationally, and pfas lies in the bottom 1.2% nationally. Elder services resides in the top 1.3% nationally, and park land lands in the top 3.0% nationally. Modeled tree cover registers in the top 4.5% nationally, modeled short sleep sits in the bottom 14.5% nationally, and housing-cost burden rests in the bottom 15% nationally. Unemployment is in the bottom 15% nationally. Against that, modeled high cholesterol stands in the top 8.6% nationally, and distance to an emergency room settles in the top 16% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, elder services runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 30523, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.9%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 96.1 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 21.4 — 75 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #780 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.9%29.3–36.7
High blood pressure among adults43.1%38.5–47.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.1%10.0–12.3
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults9.2%8.2–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.0%8.6–11.6
Depression among adults21.8%18.4–25.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.3%13.4–17.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.5%38.7–48.1
Obesity among adults35.0%26.9–43.5
Stroke among adults4.6%4.1–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.4%14.4–20.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.8%10.6–15.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.5%78.9–84.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.7%76.3–83.0
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%85.9–89.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.3%63.2–73.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.0%57.3–64.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.1%66.1–81.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.8%11.3–16.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.0%13.6–19.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.6%25.1–35.2
Short sleep duration among adults31.0%24.9–37.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.9%19.8–26.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%14.7–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults16.6%14.6–18.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.1%13.1–17.3
Any disability among adults34.8%30.4–39.7
Hearing disability among adults9.9%8.8–11.1
Independent living disability among adults9.9%8.7–11.4
Mobility disability among adults18.0%15.6–20.9
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.3–5.6
Vision disability among adults6.1%5.4–6.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.0%16.7–23.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.5%12.0–17.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.1–14.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.2–13.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.9–9.3
Loneliness among adults33.3%27.8–39.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.2–8.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6413.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)7.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)32.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)0.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle4.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription87.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate74.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population8.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households75.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+24.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age46.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$81,417$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$324,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,431$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.2 yr ± 1.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.55 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured