Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

28741

in Highlands, North CarolinaPopulation 4,257

60.14/ 100

Ranked #4,753 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 14.9%)

Ranked #99 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (top 12.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Recreation access

2.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

89.5%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.0%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

26.9%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.4%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

28%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.54 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74.9%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.3%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Highlands, North Carolina (ZIP 28741) sits in the top 14.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (4,753rd) and the top 12.5% of North Carolina (99th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: recreation rests in the top 1.0% nationally, modeled tree cover sits in the top 1.5% nationally, and modeled arsenic registers in the bottom 2.1% nationally. Modeled loneliness lands in the bottom 2.8% nationally, housing insecurity resides in the bottom 4.0% nationally, and short sleep lies in the bottom 3.1% nationally. Pharmacy settles in the top 4.4% nationally. Distance to an emergency room stands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled colon screening is in the top 3.2% nationally, and utility shutoff rests in the bottom 5.7% nationally.

In plain language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. ZIP 28717, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 99%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 85%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 96%

8%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 98.6 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 22.1 — 77 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #677 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.1%32.9–40.9
High blood pressure among adults44.8%39.9–49.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults14.2%12.8–15.5
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.8–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults9.7%8.5–10.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%7.5–10.4
Depression among adults23.1%19.3–26.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%11.6–15.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.4%39.4–49.0
Obesity among adults31.6%23.9–39.2
Stroke among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.3%6.7–10.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.9%6.5–9.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.2%81.4–86.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.8%81.9–87.3
Cholesterol screening among adults92.3%91.0–93.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.9%70.6–78.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.9%66.6–73.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.7%74.3–86.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.7%9.5–14.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.8%8.8–12.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.9%18.3–27.2
Short sleep duration among adults28.0%22.4–34.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.0%15.0–20.8
Frequent mental distress among adults12.8%11.0–14.4
Frequent physical distress among adults13.6%11.7–15.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.9%10.2–13.6
Any disability among adults34.4%29.4–38.9
Hearing disability among adults11.1%9.7–12.4
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.5–8.7
Mobility disability among adults17.1%14.4–19.6
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.3–5.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.2%14.5–20.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.1–10.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.3–8.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.3–7.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.3–5.9
Loneliness among adults26.9%22.7–31.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.6–5.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6434.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)8.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)50.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)1.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle3.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription77.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate75.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population5.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households86.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+44.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age63.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$70,392$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$631,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$836$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.8 yr ± 1.2578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.25 years of 81.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured