Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30559

in Mineral Bluff, GeorgiaPopulation 5,024

48.71/ 100

Ranked #18,060 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #314 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

45.3%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.2%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST29th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

75.3%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

10.2%

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

53.4 mi

in the top 10.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 12.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

90.6%

in the top 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

9.8%

in the top 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US79th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

93.5 days/year

in the top 26% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US74th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Mineral Bluff, Georgia (ZIP 30559) ranks in the bottom 44% nationally (18,060th) and the top 44% of Georgia (314th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: modeled arsenic settles in the bottom 5.9% nationally, and tree cover resides in the top 6.9% nationally. Modeled pfas registers in the bottom 9.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat rests at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Distance to a Superfund site stands in the top 10.9% nationally, modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the bottom 12.6% nationally, and homeownership lands in the top 16% nationally. On the other side, modeled high cholesterol sits in the top 3.8% nationally, crowded housing is in the top 15% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease settles in the top 15% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Close by, ZIP 30555, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 85%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 46%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 88.3; chronic-disease standing 15.1 — 73 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #865 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.7%31.0–38.6
High blood pressure among adults43.5%39.1–48.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.5%10.4–12.8
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.1–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults9.4%8.3–10.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.4%8.9–12.0
Depression among adults21.3%18.0–24.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.8%13.6–18.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.3%40.8–50.0
Obesity among adults38.2%30.6–46.5
Stroke among adults4.7%4.2–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.2%14.8–22.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.0%9.0–13.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.7%80.0–85.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.3%77.0–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults88.8%87.2–90.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.8%63.8–73.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.8%57.2–64.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.0%64.9–80.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.7%11.2–16.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.6%14.0–19.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.3%24.4–34.5
Short sleep duration among adults33.9%27.8–40.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.7%19.5–26.1
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.5–18.6
Frequent physical distress among adults17.0%14.8–19.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.9%13.0–16.9
Any disability among adults35.0%30.3–39.8
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.7–11.0
Independent living disability among adults9.7%8.5–11.1
Mobility disability among adults18.6%16.0–21.4
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.5
Vision disability among adults5.8%5.1–6.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.1%18.0–24.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.4%11.0–16.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.7%8.6–13.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.2–11.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.2–8.4
Loneliness among adults34.1%29.2–39.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.4–7.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6425.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)8.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)24.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)4.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle1.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription91.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate90.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population4.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households63.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+27.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age48.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$57,389$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$332,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,034$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.6 yr ± 1.8478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.84 years of 74.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured