Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30541

in Epworth, GeorgiaPopulation 2,393

50.62/ 100

Ranked #15,399 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranked #256 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tree cover

93.9%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Park land

78.3%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

4.7%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

35.8%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.2%

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST26th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

44.1%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.4 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.64%

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US18th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

9.6%

in the top 23% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US77th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

93.2 days/year

in the top 26% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US74th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

Epworth, Georgia (ZIP 30541), by its overall standing, sits in the top 48% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,399th) and the top 36% of Georgia (256th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: modeled tree cover resides in the top 0.4% nationally, park land rests in the top 0.8% nationally, and modeled pfas lies in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 5.2% nationally. Unemployment settles at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle registers at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled extreme heat stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. By contrast, poverty lands in the top 4.2% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol is in the top 6.5% nationally. Walkability resides in the bottom 9.9% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 30555, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 76%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 83.6; chronic-disease standing 20.3 — 63 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,495 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.6%29.9–37.3
High blood pressure among adults42.1%37.8–46.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.4%10.3–12.5
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults9.0%8.1–10.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.6%8.4–11.1
Depression among adults21.4%18.1–25.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.0%13.0–17.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.1%39.7–48.8
Obesity among adults38.0%30.2–46.4
Stroke among adults4.5%4.1–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.5%14.5–20.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.8%8.9–13.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.1%79.4–84.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.1%76.8–83.4
Cholesterol screening among adults88.7%87.0–90.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.7%63.9–73.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.8%59.1–66.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.5%69.1–83.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.1%11.5–17.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.7%13.2–18.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.9%23.5–32.9
Short sleep duration among adults34.1%28.0–41.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.5%18.6–24.8
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.5–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults16.2%14.3–18.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.5%12.7–16.5
Any disability among adults33.8%29.4–38.6
Hearing disability among adults9.6%8.5–10.7
Independent living disability among adults9.3%8.2–10.7
Mobility disability among adults17.5%15.1–20.2
Self-care disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.2
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.5%17.2–24.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.8%10.5–15.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.2–12.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.1–11.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.2–8.4
Loneliness among adults33.7%28.6–39.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.4–7.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate35.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6455.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)11.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription88.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate84.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population6.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households61.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+22.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age40.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$66,579$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$214,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured