Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30530

in Commerce, GeorgiaPopulation 7,260

43.88/ 100

Ranked #23,524 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #452 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

0.85%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

34.4 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

51.9 mi

in the top 11.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 30530, one of several in Commerce, Georgia places in the bottom 27% nationally (23,524th) and the bottom 36% of Georgia (452nd).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 0.5% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site is in the top 11.6% nationally. Grocery lands in the top 11.8% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure stands at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, fatal road crashes registers in the top 10.0% nationally, modeled loneliness settles in the top 12.4% nationally, and poverty sits in the top 13.0% nationally. Modeled humid heat lies in the top 14.0% nationally, modeled pfas rests in the top 16% nationally, and distance to an emergency room resides in the top 19% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 30529, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 32%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.5 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $55,392 predicts 77.7 years — 2.2 years below.

    Ranked #3,047 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.3%28.3–32.4
High blood pressure among adults40.4%37.8–42.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.3–9.6
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.6–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.5–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.9–10.8
Depression among adults22.9%20.8–25.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.7%13.5–16.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.3%37.6–43.0
Obesity among adults36.3%31.5–41.2
Stroke among adults4.3%4.1–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.2%17.3–21.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.0%12.2–16.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.8%77.2–80.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.4%75.0–79.7
Cholesterol screening among adults84.9%83.4–86.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.4%59.4–65.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.9%51.5–56.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.6%66.8–75.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%13.4–17.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.9%17.0–21.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults31.0%28.0–34.2
Short sleep duration among adults37.2%33.3–41.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.3%22.2–26.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.9%17.4–20.4
Frequent physical distress among adults17.0%15.6–18.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.3%15.7–18.8
Any disability among adults35.7%32.8–38.6
Hearing disability among adults8.7%8.0–9.4
Independent living disability among adults10.8%9.8–11.7
Mobility disability among adults17.5%16.0–19.0
Self-care disability among adults5.1%4.7–5.6
Vision disability among adults6.5%6.0–7.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.5%21.1–25.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.0%16.0–20.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.2%13.3–17.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.4%12.0–14.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.5–10.5
Loneliness among adults37.0%33.7–40.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.9–9.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6425.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)16.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)1.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle3.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription83.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate64.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population4.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households59.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+16.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age43.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$55,392$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$274,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$993$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.5 yr ± 0.7278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.72 years of 75.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured