Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60431

in Joliet, IllinoisPopulation 27,138

56.01/ 100

Ranked #8,268 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #302 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #199 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

20%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.1%

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.7%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US91st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$122,870

in the top 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

32.2%

in the bottom 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.6%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

2.4%

in the top 13.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 60431, one of several in Joliet, Illinois, by its overall standing, sits in the top 26% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,268th) and the top 22% of Illinois (302nd).

continue reading

The data is generous to this ZIP in several places worth naming: modeled hearing disability lands in the bottom 7.2% nationally, modeled coronary heart disease is in the bottom 7.0% nationally, and household income resides in the top 8.7% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol rests in the bottom 7.1% nationally, homeownership lies in the top 11.5% nationally, and modeled stroke sits in the bottom 8.3% nationally. Working the other way, modeled binge drinking settles in the top 6.2% nationally, and expected annual loss registers in the top 9.0% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the top 9.9% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure lands in the top 13.4% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 60404, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 76%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 8.7 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 86.3 — 78 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,028 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.3%20.2–24.7
High blood pressure among adults30.2%27.4–33.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.6%6.1–7.2
Current asthma among adults10.1%9.1–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults4.7%4.3–5.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
Depression among adults20.1%17.6–22.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.8%8.6–11.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.2%29.2–35.3
Obesity among adults39.5%34.8–44.7
Stroke among adults2.6%2.5–2.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.5%7.8–11.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.5%8.3–10.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.8%71.0–76.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.4%73.5–79.2
Cholesterol screening among adults86.9%85.4–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.5%55.1–63.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.2%62.9–69.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.6%64.4–77.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.0%17.4–22.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.2%10.7–13.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.0%20.1–26.2
Short sleep duration among adults37.8%33.1–42.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.1%15.3–19.1
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%15.2–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults11.6%10.5–12.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.7%11.4–14.0
Any disability among adults25.2%22.4–28.1
Hearing disability among adults5.1%4.6–5.7
Independent living disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.6
Mobility disability among adults10.9%9.7–12.2
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.7–3.2
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.8–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.8%23.0–28.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.6%12.0–15.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.6%10.1–13.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.6%11.2–14.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.6–8.1
Loneliness among adults34.4%30.7–38.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.6–8.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–644.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)6.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)32.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)2.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle2.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription95.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate93.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population9.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households43.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+10.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age35.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$122,870$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$294,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,410$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.1 yr ± 0.8178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.81 years of 80.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured