Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30308

in Atlanta, GeorgiaPopulation 23,181

65.75/ 100

Ranked #1,721 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 5.4%)

Ranked #34 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 4.8%)

Ranked #32 of 206 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

26.3%

in the bottom 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

30.2%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

2.9%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

3.2%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

23.4%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

210 intersections/sq mi

in the top 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

6.5%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

1.7 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

3.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, ZIP 30308, one of several in Atlanta, Georgia sits in the top 5.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,721st) and the top 4.8% of Georgia (34th).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: modeled high cholesterol lands in the bottom 1.5% nationally, coronary heart disease rests in the bottom 1.4% nationally, and hearing disability settles in the bottom 1.1% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure lands in the bottom 2.1% nationally, walkability rests in the top 2.3% nationally, and outpatient settles in the top 2.4% nationally. Modeled mobility disability lands in the bottom 1.6% nationally, and recreation rests in the top 2.5% nationally. Physicians settles in the top 2.7% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled transportation noise lands in the top 1.2% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 30306, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 99%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 82%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 97%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 8.6 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 98.6 (top 10%) — 90 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #17,876 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults13.0%11.7–14.6
High blood pressure among adults23.4%21.2–25.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
Current asthma among adults8.9%7.9–10.0
Coronary heart disease among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.0%2.7–3.4
Depression among adults18.9%16.6–21.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults6.7%5.9–7.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened26.3%23.9–29.1
Obesity among adults24.7%21.4–28.5
Stroke among adults1.8%1.7–2.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.1%11.1–15.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.0%7.8–10.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure65.8%63.0–68.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.2%68.8–75.5
Cholesterol screening among adults83.7%81.8–85.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.7%61.5–69.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.0%62.1–67.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.2%74.5–85.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.7%17.9–24.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.1%7.0–9.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults15.4%13.4–17.8
Short sleep duration among adults38.2%34.3–42.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.7%11.2–14.3
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.7–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults8.5%7.6–9.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.1%10.7–13.6
Any disability among adults20.9%18.6–23.6
Hearing disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.7
Independent living disability among adults6.0%5.4–6.8
Mobility disability among adults6.5%5.7–7.4
Self-care disability among adults2.3%2.1–2.5
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.2–3.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.9%19.0–24.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.7–14.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.9–10.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.7–12.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.9%7.0–8.8
Loneliness among adults37.8%33.7–41.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.3–8.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6410.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)2.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)75.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)5.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle18.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription91.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)37.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate35.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population12.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households59.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+6.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age31.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$85,693$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$390,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,890$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured