Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

29805

in Aiken, South CarolinaPopulation 4,935

48.06/ 100

Ranked #18,845 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #188 of 417 South Carolina ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranked #16 of 43 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

98.7%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST38th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

34.4 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 29805, one of several in Aiken, South Carolina lands in the bottom 41% nationally (18,845th) and the top 45% of South Carolina (188th).

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: fiber broadband lands in the top 5.3% nationally, and modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 8.3% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure is at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Modeled radon settles in the bottom 20% nationally. Set against that, fatal road crashes resides in the top 10.0% nationally, households without a vehicle registers in the top 11.8% nationally, and modeled humid heat rests in the top 13.4% nationally. Childcare stands at the national minimum, shared with about 42% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the top 23% nationally. Park land lands at the national minimum, shared with about 48% of ZIPs.

A note on the terms: arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 29856, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.7%28.1–33.4
High blood pressure among adults40.1%37.1–43.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.3–10.1
Current asthma among adults10.1%9.0–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.9%6.9–8.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.1%7.8–10.7
Depression among adults24.6%21.7–27.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.1%13.3–16.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.4%35.4–41.7
Obesity among adults36.1%31.8–40.6
Stroke among adults4.5%4.0–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.0%11.6–16.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.7%10.4–15.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.7%79.3–83.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%78.1–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.4–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.9%62.7–70.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.8%57.7–63.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.5%69.3–80.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.9%13.6–18.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.3%13.7–19.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.8%25.0–32.8
Short sleep duration among adults36.9%32.9–40.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.1%20.0–26.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.9%14.9–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults15.8%13.9–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.5%13.5–17.7
Any disability among adults33.1%29.2–37.0
Hearing disability among adults8.0%7.0–9.0
Independent living disability among adults9.9%8.6–11.4
Mobility disability among adults17.3%15.0–19.8
Self-care disability among adults5.1%4.4–5.8
Vision disability among adults6.5%5.7–7.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.0%20.9–27.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.5%15.6–21.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.0%9.8–14.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.6%11.5–15.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.9–10.6
Loneliness among adults31.0%27.4–34.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.9–10.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.5% (6.2–28.7%) n=410
Uninsured 18–6420.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.1% (5.9–25.5%) n=412
No HS diploma (25+)18.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (3.4–21.1%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)30.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.1% (9.1–48.9%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)2.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (0.2–11.1%) n=414
Households without a vehicle11.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–13.6%) n=410
Broadband subscription84.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.1% (71.4–95.1%) n=410
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.3% (12.8–35.0%) n=410
Homeownership rate86.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.3% (54.9–91.8%) n=410
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.6%) n=410
Foreign-born population2.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.7% (0.0–9.0%) n=419
Single-parent households54.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (37.6–69.9%) n=404
Population 65+28.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.6% (10.9–31.7%) n=419
Median age47.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.4 yr (33.8–54.1) n=415
Median household income$56,185$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,990 ($40,800–$90,964) n=384
Median home value$191,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($88,260–$384,940) n=383
Median gross rent$825$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$950 ($678–$1,545) n=343
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.4 yr ± 1.5878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.3 yr (73.2–79.9) n=389

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.58 years of 76.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured