Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

70730

in Ethel, LouisianaPopulation 3,990

38.79/ 100

Ranked #27,544 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 14.2%)

Ranked #258 of 508 Louisiana ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranked #56 of 83 Baton Rouge, LA ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Humid extreme heat

150.7 days/year

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

48.8%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST79th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.6 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

43.3%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

35.1 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

80.3%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST78th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

42.9%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST66th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Radon

0.8 pCi/L

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Ethel, Louisiana (ZIP 70730), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 14.2% nationally (27,544th) and the bottom 49% of Louisiana (258th).

continue reading

A few readings each way define this mixed profile: modeled loud transportation noise lies at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, modeled humid heat registers in the top 4.6% nationally, modeled high blood pressure is in the top 4.8% nationally, and walkability lies in the bottom 5.2% nationally. Modeled short sleep registers in the top 5.8% nationally. Fiber broadband is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Fatal road crashes lies in the top 9.6% nationally, and modeled loneliness registers in the top 10.5% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability is in the top 11.1% nationally, and utility shutoff lies in the top 10.8% nationally.

Defined simply, for reference, humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 70722, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Baton Rouge, LA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 60%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 45%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 83.5; chronic-disease standing 12.7 — 71 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,026 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.9%30.1–37.5
High blood pressure among adults48.8%44.1–53.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.3–9.0
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.4–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.8%7.8–9.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.1%8.8–11.5
Depression among adults26.5%22.5–30.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.3%15.0–19.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.5%37.7–46.9
Obesity among adults42.9%34.1–50.6
Stroke among adults5.2%4.7–5.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.5%18.6–26.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.1%7.5–11.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.5%78.9–83.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.5%79.1–85.4
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%84.9–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.7%61.1–72.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.5%49.3–57.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.3%73.0–86.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.8%12.7–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.1%17.2–23.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.5%31.2–41.8
Short sleep duration among adults43.3%35.8–51.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.2%24.7–32.0
Frequent mental distress among adults19.9%17.5–22.2
Frequent physical distress among adults17.3%15.2–19.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.6%17.2–22.2
Any disability among adults42.4%37.5–47.5
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.8–9.9
Independent living disability among adults11.5%10.1–13.0
Mobility disability among adults21.4%18.7–24.2
Self-care disability among adults5.9%5.3–6.7
Vision disability among adults7.5%6.7–8.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.1%26.0–34.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.7%21.2–28.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.8%17.8–24.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.2%15.6–21.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.8%10.3–13.6
Loneliness among adults37.5%31.9–43.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.1%11.5–15.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36417.8% (6.0–36.8%) n=504
Uninsured 18–644.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.4% (2.9–20.5%) n=505
No HS diploma (25+)13.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.0% (4.3–26.4%) n=508
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.6% (5.9–37.1%) n=508
Unemployment rate (16+)5.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2745.5% (0.0–13.6%) n=501
Households without a vehicle0.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3226.0% (0.0–15.0%) n=504
Broadband subscription83.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.4% (64.1–94.5%) n=504
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (9.3–41.8%) n=504
Homeownership rate87.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.4% (50.9–92.7%) n=504
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.8%) n=504
Foreign-born population0.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.2% (0.0–7.6%) n=508
Single-parent households42.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.0% (29.6–65.8%) n=495
Population 65+19.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.3% (10.2–29.0%) n=508
Median age39.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.6 yr (33.0–52.4) n=500
Median household income$64,977$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$56,458 ($34,647–$88,928) n=457
Median home value$254,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$163,450 ($86,100–$284,620) n=452
Median gross rent$738$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$915 ($606–$1,325) n=389
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)LA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.7 yr ± 0.7678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.9 yr (73.2–79.0) n=494

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.76 years of 75.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured