Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

29452

in Jacksonboro, South CarolinaPopulation 318

48.04/ 100

Ranked #18,880 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #189 of 417 South Carolina ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

5.7%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

68.3%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

19.2%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

16.6%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.4%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

1.4 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.3%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

18.8%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

68.1%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

48.3%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Jacksonboro, South Carolina (ZIP 29452), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 41% nationally (18,880th) and the top 45% of South Carolina (189th).

continue reading

The main burdens in the data show plainly and lead the picture: floodplain exposure sits in the top 1.8% nationally, unemployment registers in the top 2.2% nationally, and outer-floodplain exposure lands in the top 2.4% nationally. Walkability resides in the bottom 4.3% nationally, modeled diabetes lies in the top 6.0% nationally, and home broadband subscription settles in the bottom 5.3% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure stands in the top 5.5% nationally. More positively, modeled pfas is in the bottom 1.7% nationally, and fiber broadband rests in the top 3.7% nationally. Modeled binge drinking sits in the bottom 4.0% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 29438, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 94%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.3%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.7%29.2–36.2
High blood pressure among adults48.3%43.9–52.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.0%7.2–8.8
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.5–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%6.7–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%6.3–9.4
Depression among adults18.2%15.3–21.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.8%16.4–21.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.8%33.7–41.9
Obesity among adults40.5%33.6–47.4
Stroke among adults5.4%4.6–6.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.9%13.1–19.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.5%7.8–14.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.5%82.4–86.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.9%82.4–87.3
Cholesterol screening among adults90.1%88.3–91.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.8%61.0–70.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.4%53.8–60.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.3%70.9–83.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.3%9.3–13.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.1%10.3–16.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.6%24.5–35.0
Short sleep duration among adults40.6%34.8–46.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.3%19.4–27.6
Frequent mental distress among adults14.9%12.8–17.1
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.4–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.4%11.1–15.9
Any disability among adults32.1%27.3–37.0
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.5–7.3
Independent living disability among adults9.6%8.0–11.4
Mobility disability among adults19.2%16.0–22.7
Self-care disability among adults5.7%4.7–6.9
Vision disability among adults7.0%5.9–8.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.1%22.9–31.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.3%17.2–27.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.0%10.3–18.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.2%13.6–21.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.4–12.8
Loneliness among adults32.0%27.2–37.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.1%9.8–14.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.5% (6.2–28.7%) n=410
Uninsured 18–6433.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.1% (5.9–25.5%) n=412
No HS diploma (25+)40.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (3.4–21.1%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.1% (9.1–48.9%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)19.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (0.2–11.1%) n=414
Households without a vehicle6.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–13.6%) n=410
Broadband subscription68.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.1% (71.4–95.1%) n=410
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.3% (12.8–35.0%) n=410
Homeownership rate66.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.3% (54.9–91.8%) n=410
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.6%) n=410
Foreign-born population2.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.7% (0.0–9.0%) n=419
Single-parent households82.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (37.6–69.9%) n=404
Population 65+17.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.6% (10.9–31.7%) n=419
Median age53.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.4 yr (33.8–54.1) n=415
Median household income$113,164$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,990 ($40,800–$90,964) n=384
Median home value$97,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,400 ($88,260–$384,940) n=383
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$950 ($678–$1,545) n=343
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)SC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.3 yr ± 3.4478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.3 yr (73.2–79.9) n=389

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.44 years of 81.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured